Banner Header

Vaccines and Allergies

 
Screenshot 7children h ives
 
 
 
 

Do vaccines cause asthma or allergies?

Several large studies have investigated the relationship between vaccines and allergies.

One well-controlled study was performed using the computerized records of children born between 1991 and 1997 who were enrolled in four large health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in the United States. Researchers identified 18,407 children with asthma. The risk for asthma was not greater in children who received diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine, oral polio vaccine, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine or hepatitis B vaccine compared with children who did not receive these vaccines.

Another large well-controlled study in Sweden prospectively evaluated the risk of allergies following receipt of the pertussis vaccine in 669 children. Infants were randomized to receive one of three different diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine or a control vaccine that did not contain pertussis beginning at 2 months of age. Children were followed for about two and a half years and the risk of allergies was determined by parent questionnaires and examination of medical records. Allergic disorders studied included asthma, skin reactions, hay fever, hives and food allergies. No differences in the incidence of allergic diseases were observed in children who did or did not receive pertussis vaccine. Of interest, children with natural pertussis infections were more likely to develop allergic diseases than children not infected with pertussis.

Finally, a population-based cohort study in Australia followed 5,500 patients from ages 7 to 44 years. Investigators looked for associations between receipt of vaccines and asthma, eczema, food allergies or hay fever. No association was found between the receipt of childhood vaccines (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and smallpox) and any of these conditions.

 

  Immunisation and allergy in children and adults: A case-based approach

Case 6: Kostas

Kostas, aged 24 years, presented for an influenza vaccination, which had been recommended due to his asthma. His medical history included an egg allergy with previous anaphylaxis. Kostas had not received the influenza immunisation previously, and his general practitioner was concerned about administering it in the primary care setting.


The current influenza vaccines in Australia are derived from influenza virus grown in hens’ eggs and may potentially contain minute traces of egg protein (ovalbumin). There have been previous case reports of anaphylaxis to influenza vaccine in individuals with egg allergies;14 however, this was when the amounts of egg protein were much higher than in current vaccines.

In a review of influenza immunisation and egg allergy, there were no severe reactions after the immunisation.15 Mild side effects such as local itch, urticaria, throat irritation, wheeze or abdominal pain have been observed, but not anaphylaxis. There was also no correlation between preceding allergy testing with the vaccine and the outcome of adverse reaction.16 Current international guidelines, including those published by the Australian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA),14

  Allergic Reactions after COVID-19 VaccinationScreenshot 7cdcvbn

 
 

If You Are Having a Severe Allergic Reaction to a COVID-19 Vaccine

Severe allergic reactions to vaccines are rare but can happen. If you get a COVID-19 vaccine and you think you might be having a severe allergic reaction after leaving the vaccination provider site, seek immediate medical care by calling 911.

A severe allergic reaction can cause:

  • difficulty breathing or wheezing,
  • a drop in blood pressure,
  • swelling of the tongue or throat, or
  • a generalized rash or hives, which may include mucus membranes.

If You Had a Rash on the Arm where You Got a COVID-19 Shot

If you had a red, itchy, swollen, or painful rash where you got a COVID-19 shot, you should still get another shot at the scheduled date and time. This applies to second, additional, or booster shots. Your vaccination provider may recommend that you get your next COVID-19 vaccine in the opposite arm, if possible.

These rashes can start a few days to more than a week after your shot and are sometimes quite large. These rashes are also known as “COVID arm.” Tell your vaccination provider that you experienced a rash or “COVID arm” after your shot. Your vaccination provider may recommend that you get your next COVID-19 vaccine in the opposite arm if possible.

If the rash is itchy, you can take an antihistamine. If it is painful, you can take a pain medication like acetaminophen or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).

  Shingles vaccine side effects

Shingles vaccine side effects

Like all vaccines, the shingles vaccines (Zostavax and Shingrix) can cause side effects, but they're generally mild and do not last long.

Common side effects that occur in at least 1 in 10 people are:

  • headache
  • redness, pain, swelling, itching and warmth at the injection site
  • fatigue

If any side effects carry on for longer than a few days, speak to your GP or practice nurse.

Tell your GP if you develop a rash after having the shingles vaccination.

Catching chickenpox from the shingles vaccine

Very occasionally, a person has developed chickenpox following shingles vaccination (fewer than 1 in 10,000 individuals).

Allergic reaction to shingles vaccination

There is a very small chance of a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) to the shingles vaccine, as there is with other vaccines.

Anaphylaxis is very serious and potentially life-threatening, but it can be treated. All healthcare staff that deliver vaccinations are trained in this. With prompt treatment, people fully recover from anaphylaxis.

Monitoring the safety and side

 

  Who can have the shingles vaccine?

You're eligible for the shingles vaccine when you're aged 70 to 79.

When you're eligible, you can have the shingles vaccination at any time of year.

The shingles vaccine is not available on the NHS to anyone aged 80 and over because it seems to be less effective in this age group.

Australian Vaccines

  Vaccine history timeline

 

 Screenshot 83 vaccines in aus

 

A history of Adolescent school -bAsedvAccinAtion in AustrAliA

 Pre-1970s
One of the earliest recorded national school-based
vaccination programs in Australia provided the
diphtheria–tetanus toxoid (dT) vaccine from 1932
to 1936.11 This was followed by the introduction of
the bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine, deliv-
ered through schools in some jurisdictions from
the late 1940s to the mid-1980s. The Northern
Territory was the only jurisdiction to continue rou-
tinely offering this until 1990 (Table 1).12,13 Some
states and territories also used schools to deliver
polio vaccine during the 1950s and 1960s as part of
larger mass vaccination programs.

QLD Health

  School Immunisation Program

 

  A short history of vaccination campaigns in Australia and what we might expect with COVID-19

We can trace school-based vaccination programs in Australia back to the early 1930s, when diphtheria vaccination campaigns began, followed by the first mass childhood vaccination campaigns against whooping cough in the early 1940s.

Mass vaccination programs again polio began in 1956 and were so "spectacularly successful … polio had been virtually eliminated from Australia" by 1966, write researchers in a 2001 Medical Journal of Australia article. A schoolgirl rubella vaccination program began in 1971.

 /www.herpes.org.nz

 /www.herpes.org.nz

 
Screenshot 7plain hit ground
 
 
 

Shingles vaccine side effects

Like all vaccines, the shingles vaccines (Zostavax and Shingrix) can cause side effects, but they're generally mild and do not last long.

Common side effects that occur in at least 1 in 10 people are:

  • headache
  • redness, pain, swelling, itching and warmth at the injection site
  • fatigue

If any side effects carry on for longer than a few days, speak to your GP or practice nurse.

Tell your GP if you develop a rash after having the shingles vaccination.

Catching chickenpox from the shingles vaccine

Very occasionally, a person has developed chickenpox following shingles vaccination (fewer than 1 in 10,000 individuals).

Allergic reaction to shingles vaccination

There is a very small chance of a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) to the shingles vaccine, as there is with other vaccines.

Anaphylaxis is very serious and potentially life-threatening, but it can be treated. All healthcare staff that deliver vaccinations are trained in this. With prompt treatment, people fully recover from anaphylaxis.

Monitoring the safety and side

 
 
 
 
 
Screenshot 6kill kenny
 
 
 Last week, at a dinner event in Manhattan, the Democratic primary candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. shared his unvarnished thoughts about the nature of the coronavirus. “There’s an argument that it is ethnically targeted,” he explained, in remarks captured on video. “COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.” To be sure, Kennedy added, “we don’t know whether it was deliberately targeted or not.” In other words, Kennedy apparently believes it is an open question whether the pandemic was engineered by a shadowy cabal to spare Chinese and Jewish people.
 
Screenshot 4anti b

Jerusalem Post Admits jews Are Behind Coronavirus Vaccines

Screenshot 1jews behind vaccines

Jerusalem Post Admits jews Are Behind Coronavirus Vaccines

Jerusalem Post Admits jews Are Behind Coronavirus Vaccines

Jerusalem Post Admits jews Are Behind Coronavirus Vaccines

One can’t escape their presence in the forefront of leading companies in the race to find a vaccine that will prevent coronavirus.” – Jerusalem Post

Of course the Jerusalem Post is trying to make it seem like a good thing that a bunch of jewish supremacists are behind the development of vaccines that will put neurotoxins into people and change their genetic structure. I guess we should be saying, Thanks jews!

Greer Fay Cashman starts out the article by explaining how jews are almost always at the top of any field, even though they are such a small part of the world population.

The individual does not necessarily represent the pack, but when the individual achieves fame or notoriety, he or she is immediately associated for good and for bad by friend and foe with the country or faith into which he or she was born. This is particularly so in the case of Jews, who, after all is said and done, represent a minuscule percentage of the world’s population. Nonetheless, it is amazing how many accomplished individuals there have been, in any number of fields, whose biographical details, as published by Wikipedia, include mention of the fact that he or she was born into a Jewish family. There are far fewer references to someone being born Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Episcopalian, Catholic, Protestant, Anglican, Mormon, etc., although given their political clout, there is increasing mention of Evangelicals.

Of course when we are dealing with the field of “medicine” (poison) we are bound to find an extremely high number of jews.

Getting back to singling out Jews, one can’t escape their presence in the forefront of leading companies in the race to find a vaccine that will prevent coronavirus.

The article goes on to mention only Albert Bourla, who heads Pfizer, and Dr. Tal Zaks, who is Moderna’s chief medical officer, and how they have been attacked by “anti-semites,” but there are many more jews Cashman could have mentioned.

For example, Michael Dolsten is the chief scientist at Pfizer, who is leading the company’s vaccine charge. He said, “There has been a strong Jewish tradition around contributing to humanity and a strong tradition within medicine.” He also said that he hope hopes the US stays a “melting pot,” which itself was a genocidal concept cooked up by jew Israel Zangwill.

Pfizer and Moderna received $1.95 and $2.5 billion respectively through Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, and soon they will be seeking emergency use approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after they cooked their books about the safety and efficacy of their vaccines.

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, whose maternal grandmother was a jew (which would make his mother and himself a jew as well), has said that a vaccine will go first to “wherever it’s going to add the most value according to the data and the science and the recommendations of our experts.” Just trust the experts, goyim!

If you value the health and safety of yourself and your loved ones, you will stay as far away from this jewish vaccine as possible!



Jews Run the CDC Centers for Disease Control

Screenshot 3cdc jewish director

Walensky is married to Loren D. Walensky, also a physician-scientist. They have three sons. They are Jewish and members of Temple Emanuel in Newton, Massachusetts.
Vzdělání: Washington University (BA); Johns ...
Narození: Rochelle Paula Bersoff; April 5, 1969 (age ...
Ředitel: Joe Biden

Rochelle Walensky - Wikipedia

" Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH, is the 19th Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the ninth Administrator of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry."

Dr. Rochelle Walensky takes over at CDC – The Forward

https://forward.com › news › dr-roc...
 
9. 2. 2021 — Walensky is “a tireless champion of the core Jewish value of pikuach nefesh, saving life,” said Rabbi Michelle Robinson of Temple Emanuel...
 
 
Screenshot 27jewishw
 
MRDETROIT76
I have to admit I didnt believe the jews did it or were behind everything bad until i saw I POTS series. he details everything with proof that i was able to verify. the jews really r behind all the bs. its really true. By the way I was a jew not anymore.
 
TonySopran0
I think Jews tend to vote Democrat, purely because they swallowed the same BS, white liberals believe. They believe they are “helping the poor”, by voting Democrat, and charity is a very important value in Judaism, similar to how Christians believe in helping the poor, but what they are really doing, by voting Democrat, is costing themselves more money in the long run. Jews tend to make more money then non Jews, let’s just be honest, and they tend to live in higher taxed states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, etc. What they really do, by voting Democrat, is basically, unknowingly give the democrat party, as well as the government more of the money, they rightfully earned, and they end up keeping less of it. Blacks and Hispanics tend to vote Democrat more as well, but for completely different reasons. For them it’s for their own self interest, basically for more free welfare and government money. People need to run, not walk, from the Democrat party, no matter your fait
 
 
Screenshot 4laural
 
 
 
Laura Lomer Is Jewish person who is exposing Jews behind House bill 269 seeks to curb free speech
 
Screenshot 4bill 269
 
Screenshot 32pfizers p
 
 
 Alex Jones presents video footage from an interview with the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, where he admits that an agreement was made with Pfizer to use the Israeli people as test subjects for their new COVID vaccine.
 
 
 
 
 

You can read the full letter at AmericasFrontlineDoctors.org.

Screenshot 7pseson fron israel

WARNING!! From an Unvaccinated Person in Israel.

WARNING!! From an Unvaccinated Person in Israel

The Testimonies Project

The Testimonies Project

Jewish testimonies about Covid jab results.  The testimonies project - the mo...

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Screenshot 4stone hole and head

Is This An Ancient Archeological Treasure Trove Or An Elaborate Hoax? | Time Team | Odyssey

 

“Black Lives Matter”

  • Friday, 04 September 2020 05:18

Rabbi Admits Jews ‘Invented’ The Concept ‘All Lives Matter’ To Promote Jewish Interests

 

In the wake of the “Black Lives Matter” riots, looting and mayhem, we have often heard the counter argument that “All Lives Matter” — a phrase which turns out to have a decidedly Jewish history, according to Rabbi Moshe Levine:

Throughout history Jews have tried the “all lives matter” argument. We brought the idea of ethical monotheism to the world — under the foundational beliefs that all humans are created in the image of God. In a world dominated by social hierarchies, the early Israelites and prophets railed against this unjust caste system, starting a long process of moral progression. We practically invented the idea of “all lives matter.”

According to Jewish tradition, we then tried teaching this to the Egyptians, Babylonians, Greeks and Romans – yet their hostility towards others, specifically us, went unstopped. We engaged in medieval debates with the Christan [sic] hegemony, making the argument that all humans are inherently valuable and godly. Yet the libels, pogroms and scapegoating never ceased.

Finally, we thought after the Enlightenment that anti-Semitism would soon be over. Finally the world recognized that all lives matter — that people have fundamental and unalienable rights that need not depend on color or creeds. Yet we all know how that worked out.

Theodere Herzl was a young secular Jew born in Hungary. Like many Jewish intellectuals at that time, he wanted Judaism to simply assimilate into the broader and better European culture so they could thrust off their “shameful Jewish characteristics” and stop anti-Semitism. The superior Western European culture, Herzl preached, was proclaiming a message of equality and acceptance for everyone. They were singing “all lives matter.”

Yet it is never that easy. Thousands of years of anti-Semtiism cannot be erased by a few changed laws and edicts. Hatred of Jews and systemic anti-Semitism was still ubiquitous throughout all facets of society. Herzl came to this realization during the Dreyfus affair as he heard angry mobs shouting “death to the Jews.” Soon the vast majority of worldwide Jewry would come to the same conclusion as they witnessed the horrors that took place during the Holocaust.

So much for “all lives matter,” Herzl thought. A continent with a history and foundation of anti-Semitism can never be a safehaven or home to Jews unless there is a miraculous change. And we are done waiting for miracles.

The “all lives matter” song of Jewish history slowly stopped and was replaced by “Jewish lives matter.” A state for the Jews, in our historic and indigenous homeland, where we can govern and protect ourselves, cultivate our tradition and keep it alive, and be a refuge for any Jew in trouble. Yes — Zionis mis the ultimate claim that Jewish lives matter.

Jews have come to the difficult but important realization that we need to occasionally thrust aside universalism in favor of particularism. We understand that while we need to be constantly dedicated to global and universal issues, Jewish-specific education and protection is paramount to our well-being. We have no issue proudly advocating for the fact that “Jewish lives matter.”

Because of this, we don’t just have a moral imperative to support Black Lives Matter. We have a personal one. The same history and values that inspire me to be an outspoken Zionist underpin my support for Black Lives Matter.

So Jews tried to convince White Christian Europeans that Jews were their “equals”, and Whites just weren’t buying it — because they still had an innate sense of self-preservation.

The egalitarian ruse that “All Lives Matter” is a Jewish Trojan Horse to convince us to let our guard down and invite a hostile, alien people into our midst and allow them to subvert and destroy us.

So-called “antisemitism” has been the healthy and hygienic response to this dangerous Trojan Horse.

But as this rabbi admits, the “All Lives Matter” ploy is just that — what they truly believe is indeed the Jewish supremacist mindset that only “Jewish Lives Matter” — and “Black Lives Matter” only if  it is “Good for the Jews“.

It is shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that Alicia Garza (nee Schwartz), the head of “Black Lives Matter,” is Jewish.

So next time you find yourself countering the “Black Lives Matter” mantra with “No, All Lives Matter,” just know that you’ve fallen into a Jewish rhetorical trap.

The two choices in this false dichotomy are Black supremacy or Jewish supremacy  — and both are ultimately Jewish.

“White Lives Matter” is never a consideration — that’s “hate”.

Pick your poison, goyim.

Also on Christians for Truth:

Reader Interactions

Comments

Anti-semitism

  • Saturday, 20 July 2024 04:49

Screenshot 2anti semitism

Anti-Semitism is just a way to stop criticism of Jewish criminality againt all people including Jews.

"Antisemitic, its a trick we always use"

Anti-Semitism

Anti-Semitism is an artificial construct created to silence critics of the Jews, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said.

Anyone who hates the Jewish people is Anti-Semitic. In reality, however, many New World Order/Globalists who are members of the Jewish organization are Zionists and have no regard for the Jewish community.  They use their organizations as a smokescreen to push their ideas and agendas, and call any person who exposes or disagrees with their agendas anti-Semitic.

Israel minister, " We always use the anti-Semitism trick or bring up the Holocaust." Shulamit Alui shows how the Zionist lobby does not represent  all Jews or Israel.

Anti-Semitism is just a way to stop criticism of Jewish criminality.

Flashback: Israeli Politician Admits Jews Invoke The Holocaust and Antisemitism to Silence Critics

Learn to like true Jews.

"Anti-Semitism!!" -- EXPOSED

 

 

 

Rabbi Predicts A Holocaust For Jews

 

Also on Christians for Truth:

The Rise And Fall Of The Aztec Empire

Screenshot 2aztec empire

The rise and fall of the Aztec Empire.

The Rise And Fall Of The Aztec Empire

The Haitian Revolution

  • Friday, 25 June 2021 07:53
 Screenshot 2haitian r killed w

The white European Poles joined forces with Haitian people and fourth for their freedom.

 
 
Oscar
A horrible GENOCIDE was committed in Haiti against white people, men, women and children led by Dessalines in 1804 and in 1805 a totally racist Constitution was made against the few white people who were alive after the genocide.
François de Vimeur
Haiti was only ever prosperous under French control.
matthew mann
Question is how did Black Haitians view Native Hatians
 
Jews Sell Blacks

Jews Sell Blacks

    "Jews Selling Blacks" Book Stirs Reparations Movement.
 
 
 
Screenshot 2killing whites
 
In this episode of Vlogs Of History we cover The Haitian Revolution. This was the only colonial revolution to successfully abolish slavery and gain its independence from France. It was a very violent revolution and involved a lot of angry slaves who had had enough of the horrible working conditions of Haiti's sugar plantations.
 
Oscar
A horrible GENOCIDE was committed in Haiti against white people, men, women and children led by J.J.Dessalines in 1804 and in 1805 a totally racist Constitution was made against the few white people who were alive after the horrible genocide.
 
 Alex N.
"They killed every white man that they found" WRONG. They didn't killed German and Pole soldiers who defected the French army to support the Haitian cause. And these peoples are white. Also, in the first constitution white widows and European soldiers who fought for Haiti were granted citizenship and considered "neg" (black). The Haitian revolution wasn't whites v.s. blacks or the first "race war" as the alt-right depicts. The Haitian Revolution was rather the oppressed against the oppressor.
Patrick Altema
You should have mentioned the debt that France put on Haiti to recognize them as a nation and lift the European embargo
 
 
 

 Frederic Gaillot

This is certainly the most detailed and interesting video I've seen on Haiti independence. One aspect I would like to correct on the aspect of the debt. It was paid from 1825 until 1888, with interruptions from 1852. Haiti was occupied by the US from 1915 until 1934. Most of the economy of the country was under US control, the local currency linked to the dollars in 1922, all expenses and revenues under direct US administration (and benefit), customs were even under US control until 1946.
 
Screenshot 1jews ships
 
 
 
 
 
 

The Incredible Story of The PayPal Mafia

Screenshot 3kgb

FASCINATING - KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov reveals Russian Subversion Tactics - Full Interview

This is G. Edward Griffin's shocking video interview, Soviet Subversion of the Free-World Press (1984), where he interviews ex-KGB officer and Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov who decided to openly reveal KGB's subversive tactics against western society as a whole. Bezmenov explains how Jewish Marxist ideology is destabilizing the economy and purposefully pushing the U.S. into numerous crises so that a "Big Brother" tyranny can be put into place in Washington, how most Americans don't even realize that they are under attack, and that normal parliamentary procedures will not alter the federal government's direction.
 
He then explains how Marxist leaders use informers to make lists of anti-Communist and other politically incorrect people who they want to execute once they - actually a Jewish oligarchy - come to power. The oligarch's secret lists include "civil rights" activists and idealistically-minded "useful idiot" leftists as well.
 
Bezmenov provides several real world examples of how Marxist leaders even execute and/or imprison each other. Also he explains how American embassy employees were known to betray Soviets attempting to defect, how there existed a "triangle of hate" in the Soviet government, why he realized that Marxism-Leninism was a murderous doctrine, and how the CIA ignored (or didn't care) about Communist subversion.
 
He also mentions that revolutions throughout history are never the result of a majority movement, but of a small dedicated and highly-organized group who seize power, whether for good or bad. Next he explains how the American mass media spread lies about life in the Soviet Union.
 
Bezmenov also explains how the LOOK magazine article falsely claimed that the Russian people were proud of their victory in the Second World War, where in reality the Judeo-Bolshevik-Communist-Marxist government was happy that Hitler had been defeated so that they could remain in power.
 
Find out how the KGB utilized various individuals to undermine the Western society in its morals and values.
 
 
 
Screenshot 3stages communist take over
 
 
 overwatch 999
Sadly commies are still active in every sector in India from politics and media to education system. They are a dangerous lot.
 
Linda Mitchell
This is spot on accurate and America did NOT heed his warning on how to stop this to keep America Free. Instead, these "USEFUL IDIOTS" have been running rampant the last several decades. The school & Universities have been doing the opposite of what he said & now we are seeing the result of these decades of brainwashing ...all these young people that have become "Useful Idiots' causing anarchy in the streets of America. Only the hand of God can save us now. He gave us Trump to try to do that but it is looking so bleak. Lord Jesus help us
 
 Swamp Witches & Voodoo Dialogues
Communist countries, oddly enough, have imposed forced labor, making folks produce junk for export to another growing middle class, which in turn buys even more junk and goes into even more debt. This scheme has to keep moving. The truth is, when it does stop, things will be worse.
 
 John Sojka
Do you know what's funny? Prior to watching the video, an ad for Bernie Sanders played pushing Socialism!
 
Demoralization Destabilization Crisis Dictatorship
 
Jason Williams
Bottom line... The only reason the US hasn't fallen yet is because Communism fell in the USSR in 1991, but we were on track to have fallen by now. The damage Bezmenov details (Demoralization) in this incredible interview is done though, and that's why we see the Left desperately trying to push us into the Destabilization stage. Obama did a lot to get us there and if Hillary got elected we would have been there by now. I think the most important thing Bezmenov mentions in this interview is that the false sense of security we have in the US is not real, we ARE at war with the Globalist Left.
 
Screenshot 3brainwashing all p
 
KGB DEFECTOR YURI BEZMENOV'S WARNING TO AMERICA:
 
In 1984, Soviet defector and KGB operative, Yuri Bezmenov, specializing in the fields of Marxist-Leninist propaganda and ideological subversion; warned us about the silent war being waged against America as part of a long term plan to take over and destroy the American system and way of life. YOUR way of life.
 
As you watch this clip, you'll realize he is describing EXACTLY what's happening in America TODAY, where by Obama and his gang of Marxist usurpers were just the culmination of a very long term plan, but are the ones who are about to bring it into fruition. Stay wise my friends... nothing is a coincidence.
 
Forever Evolving
Isreal is responsible for the demoralization and everything else in Europe and America. And pretty much any other country whites inhabit except Russia. The Jewish do not consider themselves Caucasian and consider non Jewish whites to be their biggest enemy and hurdle they have to overcome to dominate. They control the wealth, media, school system, military, government, and even trump. Trump's campaign was built by Jared kushner, basically netanyahus godson, and had Trump's daughter convert to Judaism. Trump takes office and declares Jerusalem is isreals capital and gives them billions and billions of dollars and continues to push any agenda they need.
 
 
 
 Kenneth Sumerford
Demoralization started big-time in the USA during the 1970s. Father KNows Best went to Father May Know Something. By 1990 it was Father Knows LIttle and Mother is Only A Little Smarter than the Kids. Men have been pushed down and families have been berated and made to look like a bad patriarchy or an out-dated institution.
 
 

 “Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”

 

I think you underestimate that fact that Communism was created by Judaism.

“Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.”
Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935

“The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”
The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250

“Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”
Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936

“Judaism is Marxism, communism”
Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64

“The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.”
Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143

“We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.”
The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11

“The picture which the Soviet Union presents today is one that should bring rejoicing to world Jewry.”
The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18, 1936, page 51

“It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.”
Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106

“That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.”
The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920

“The Bolshevik Government of Russia is the key-stone of the arch of the proof of the Jewish conspiracy for radicalism and world-domination.”
William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920), p. 31

“The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism”
Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix

“The Jews [have been] furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders”
The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11

“Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement”
The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20

“Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.”
Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37

 
 

world bill of rights

  • Tuesday, 30 April 2024 10:33

Screenshot 10prime crimet

Prime Crime: The Drug Planting Scandal That Shocked the Nation

 

This is a main reason to know your rights and never ever just let the police search your stuff because they ask.
 
 

 

Screenshot 1rex is jewish

Exposing The Neocon Right: We Are Not The Party Of Ben Shapiro

The Universal Bill of Rights

We the People Universal Declaration of the Bill of Rights

To Promote The Universal Bill of Rights for The United States. 

 

Many people are starting to realize globally they do not have a bill of rights, with the only country in the world that does, is the United States of America. As many are starting to realize we cannot sack our politicians, we have no rights to keep and bear arms, no rights for assembly, no rights to replace CEO's in media, no rights to have our own press, no rights to free speech, and the list goes so, presented below is a universal version that emulates and takes inspiration from the below bullet points, with additional critical factors to cater for the global population.

  • The Australian Constitution Section 128 allows the Australians to make changes to the Constitution by referenda.
  • This Constitution shall not be altered except in the following manner: By the People.
  • Switzerland citizen initiated referenda: Support CIR as a way of allowing all electors to have a direct say in government decision-making. Our present system of government only allows political parties the right to decide for the rest of us.
  • We The People Start using CIR at rallies and meetings.

Propose changes to the constitution using section 128

 Australian Constitution Section 128 allows Australians to make changes to the Constitution.

  1. Introduction of Citizens Initiated Referenda (CIR), giving Australians the opportunity to have their say and bring about change without waiting for politicians to listen and act.
  2. Nuremberg laws to use the law to stop anybody or group, party, company, media, from killing people (Genocide).
  3. National and all state police Commissioners to be elected by the Australian People and be sacked by referenda.
  4. To promote the United Nations Human Rights laws
  5. All Supreme Court Judges must be elected by the people in Australia and be sacked by referenda.

       6. The Australian constitution "Section 44 of the Constitution forbids anyone who bears allegiance to a foreign nation from sitting in Parliament, otherwise, it is considered treason.

     7.  Indigenous Rights For All Races All Over The World.

      8.  Equality Law: In the pass, we were innocent till proven guilty, the law now has been changed, now you’re guilty and you have to prove your innocence.

       9. Equality to all different races as special races by change the word from Human Race to Human Races to give respect to all races on the planet.

         10.   A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

   11. Equality Rights for Cultural or Racial homogeneous Populations

       12. "Equality affirms that all human beings are born free and equal.

      13. To build people's media and Internet.

        14. To build people's Bank.

Original U.S. Bill of Rights

Amendment I (1):Freedom of religion, speech, and the press; rights of assembly and petition
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II (2): Right to bear arms
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III (3): Housing of soldiers
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV (4): Search and arrest warrants
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V (5): Rights in criminal cases
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

Amendment VI (6): Rights to a fair trial
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII (7): Rights in civil cases
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII (8): Bails, fines, and punishments
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX (9): Rights retained by the people
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X (10): Powers retained by the states and the people
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

If we ask our politicians to give us a bill of rights, they will ignore such a request, so we must demand and campaign for a bill of rights collectively and put it in operation ourselves “we the people.” Solutions to gather votes are either face-to-face interactions or through social media. With face-to-face interactions could be but are not limited to such as events and rallies. The people are given a legal leaflet to vote, and with a certain number of signatures, the legal documents can be recognized and heard through parliament. This approach same applies digitally. Other approaches are accepted for a fair voting system that doesn’t jeopardize privacy and safety of the voter and to make these documents legal is section 128 of the original Australian constitution by referenda.

Australian Constitution Section 128

Our Constitution may be altered only with the APPROVAL OF THE PEOPLE at a Referendum.

The Constitution of Australia is the supreme law under which the Australian Commonwealth Government operates.  The Constitution consists of several documents and the most important one is the "Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia."  The Constitution was approved in referendums held over 1898 to 1900 by the people of the Australian colonies and the approved draft was enacted as a section of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp), an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.  The Commission of Assent was signed by Queen Victoria on 9 July 1900, upon which the Constitution became law.  The Constitution came into force on 1 January 1901.  Even though the Constitution was originally given legal force by an Act of the United Kingdom parliament, the Australia Acts removed the power of the United Kingdom parliament to change the Constitution and only the Australian people can amend it (by referendum).

Other pieces of legislation have constitutional significance for Australia.  These are the Statute of Westminster, as adopted by the Commonwealth in the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942 and the Australia Act 1986, which was passed in equivalent forms by the Parliaments of every Australian state, the United Kingdom, and the Australian Federal Parliament.  Together, these Acts had the effect of severing all constitutional links between Australia and the United Kingdom.  Even though the same person, Queen Elizabeth II, is the monarch of both countries she acts in a distinct capacity as monarch of each.

Under Australia's common law system, the High Court of Australia and the Federal Court of Australia have the authority to interpret constitutional provisions. Their decisions determine the interpretation and application of the constitution.  [Ref: Wikipedia]

AUSTRALIA'S NWO PROTECTION:  OUR CONSTITUTION
Sir David Smith explains how most Australians don't know Australia has a written Constitution and the Constitution is an inbuilt safeguard that ensures any government that seeks to change the Australian Constitution, must first get the approval of the Australian Public as outlined in Section 128 of the Australian Constitution.

Australia has a Constitution which gives Australian people the right to vote on major changes to Australia through Referendums (More on this further below).

Section 128:  Australian Constitution Section 128 “Our Constitution may be altered only with the APPROVAL OF THE PEOPLE at a Referendum.”

We acknowledge Mike Holt of CIRNow (formerly Restore Australia), for allowing us permission to use his article below on Section 128 of the Australian Constitution:

- Beginning Quote -

This is Section 128 of the 1901 Constitution that we want to change so that We the People have the power to achieve the Australia we want.

The change we are advocating is to amend Section 128 of the current Constitution by adding a paragraph to allow Citizens (as well as the Parliament), the right to initiate referenda to change the Constitution. At present, only our elected representatives in the House can initiate referendums. Then they allow the people to vote on them.

Ever since the constitution came into being in 1901 there have been 45 referendums, yet only 8 have been approved by the people.

The change to Section 128 of the Constitution we are advocating would then be as shown below with the changes in bold type.

Note: 1% of eligible voters equates to about 140,000 signatures.

ALTERATION of the CONSTITUTION

Section 128;  This Constitution shall not be altered except in the following manner:

By the People.

Any elector or group of electors vote for the election of the House of Representatives may initiate a proposal to change this Constitution by submitting a Petition to the Governor General.  The Petition shall include the proposed alteration of this Constitution.  On receipt of such a Petition signed by not less than one per cent of the electors qualified to vote for the election of the House of Representatives, and verified by the Electoral Commissioner, the Governor-General shall within three months submit the proposal to referendum.

By the Parliament.

A proposed law by the Parliament for the alteration thereof must be passed by an absolute majority of each House of the Parliament, and not less than two nor more than six months after its passage through both Houses.  The proposed law shall be submitted in each State and Territory to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the House of Representatives.

Also, if either House passes any such proposed law by an absolute majority, and the other House rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with any amendment to which the first-mentioned House will not agree.  Then if after an interval of three months the first-mentioned House in the same or the next session again passes the proposed law by an absolute majority with or without any amendment which has been made or agreed to by the other House, and such other House rejects or fails to pass it or passes it with any amendment to which the first-mentioned House will not agree.  The Governor-General may submit the proposed law as last proposed by the first-mentioned House, and either with or without any amendments subsequently agreed to by both Houses, to the electors in each State and Territory qualified to vote for the election of the House of Representatives.

When a proposed law is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such manner as the Parliament prescribes. But until the qualification of electors of members of the House of Representatives becomes uniform throughout the Commonwealth, only one-half the electors voting for and against the proposed law shall be counted in any State in which adult suffrage prevails.

And if in a majority of the States a majority of the electors voting approve the proposed law, and if a majority of all the electors voting also approve the proposed law, it shall be presented to the Governor-General for the Queen’s assent.

No alteration diminishing the proportionate representation of any State in either House of the Parliament, or the minimum number of representatives of a State in the House of Representatives, or increasing, diminishing, or otherwise altering the limits of the State, or in any manner affecting the provisions of the Constitution in relation thereto, shall become law unless the majority of the electors voting in that State approve the proposed law.

In this section, Territory means any territory referred to in section one hundred and twenty-two of this Constitution in respect of which there is in force a law allowing its representation in the House of Representatives.

- End Quote -  

Citizens Initiated Referenda (CIR), giving Australians the opportunity to have their say and bring about change.

Screenshot 11most people have the power

One Nation Party is promoting the Citizens Initiated Referenda (CIR), giving Australians the opportunity to have their say and bring about change without waiting for politicians to listen and act.


Restore Australia has substantial detail about ideas on giving power to the people.  The founders of Restore Australia aim to amend Section 128 of the Australian Constitution to put the power into the hands of the people to start referendums. Bringing in Citizens Initiated Referendums (CIR) would allow Australian voters to decide on the type of government it wants, and make politicians directly accountable to the people.  The links to these pages are listed below. 

Section 128 of the Constitution

Citizens Initiated Referendums (CIR)
Electronic Voting

The First Amendment: (B)

Promote Citizen Initiative Referenda (CIR) in Country

Political parties do not represent people's rights, so we must start to promote (CIR) Citizens Initiative all over the World

Support CIR as a way of allowing all electors to have a direct say in government decision-making. Our present system of government only allows political parties the right to decide for the rest of us.

 Promote CIR in your country and remove political parties and We the People govern the country.

Switzerland Citizen Initiated Referenda (CIR)

Citizens Initiative Referendas ( CIR ) For We the people.

Switzerland's System of Direct Democracy
Switzerland is a confederation made up of 26 cantons which are small territorial divisions of the country.  The Swiss Government, Parliaments, and Courts operate on three levels:  Federal, Cantonal and Communal.

Federally, Switzerland has a two level federal parliament with a House of Representatives that represent the people and a senate that represents the federal cantons.  There are several systems which can be implemented under a Canon Law system.  For example, a police force could be appointed by the people and work for the people, instead of just representing the government, and a Supreme Court, as outlined above.

Australian Constitution Forbids anyone who bears allegiance to a foreign nation from sitting in Parliament.

 The Australian parliament does not inforce this law and sllec group has too much power over the Australia.

 The following quote from Electoral Backgrounder:  Parliamentary report on Section 44 of the Constitution

"Section 44 of the Constitution forbids anyone who bears allegiance to a foreign nation from sitting in Parliament, otherwise, it is considered treason.  We believe that any political parties or politicians who seek to destroy the country through third world immigration, the destruction of manufacturing, industry, and farming etc have COMMITTED TREASON under Section 44 of the Constitution."

What is Section 44?

"Section 44 of the Constitution sets out restrictions on who can be a candidate for Federal parliament.  In full it reads:

44. Any person who -

     (i.)   Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power:  or

     (ii.)  Is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offense punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer:  or

     (iii.)  Is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent:  or

     (iv.)  Holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth:  or

    (v.)  Has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons:  shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.

But sub-section iv. does not apply to the office of any of the Queen's Ministers of State for the Commonwealth, or of any of the Queen's Ministers for a State, or to the receipt of pay, half pay, or a pension, by any person as an officer or member of the Queen's navy or army, or to the receipt of pay as an officer or member of the naval or military forces of the Commonwealth by any person whose services are not wholly employed by the Commonwealth.  [Ref:  Section 44 of the Constitution E-Brief: Online Only issued March 2004; Ian Holland]"

END

Pro Changes to the Constitution and intro the Bill Of Rights to inforce the Section 44 by using Citizens Initiated Referenda (CIR)

“ Forbids anyone who bears allegiance to a foreign nation from sitting in Parliamentary, Policial Parties, or CEO’s and boards from Running the following , mainstream Media including TV, Radio, Newspapers, Banks including the Federal Bank and the printing of money otherwise, it is considered treason.”

Australian Equity act

The following quote from Australian equity act

https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/human-rights-and-anti-discrimination/human-rights-scrutiny/public-sector-guidance-sheets/rights-equality-and-non-discrimination.  Rights of equality and non-discrimination

What are the rights of equality and non-discrimination?

"Equality affirms that all human beings are born free and equal. Equality presupposes that all individuals have the same rights and deserve the same level of respect. All people have the right to be treated equally. This means that laws, policies and programs should not be discriminatory, and also that public authorities should not apply or enforce laws, policies and programs in a discriminatory or arbitrary manner.

Non-discrimination is an integral part of the principle of equality. It ensures that no one is denied their rights because of factors such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property or birth. In addition to those grounds, discrimination on certain other grounds may also be prohibited. These grounds include age, nationality, marital status, disability, place of residence within a country and sexual orientation.

Sometimes it may be necessary to treat people differently to achieve equality. This is because differences between people may make it difficult for them to enjoy their rights without support. Different treatment may not amount to prohibited discrimination if the criteria for the differentiation are reasonable and objective and if the aim is to achieve a purpose which is legitimate under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The right to equality and non-discrimination encompasses both positive and negative obligations - the obligation to refrain from discriminating or eroding equality and the obligation to protect and advance the fulfilment and enjoyment of the rights to equality and non-discrimination for all people."

Where do rights of equality an

Equality Laws

Equality Law: In the pass, we were innocent till proven guilty, the law now has been changed, now you’re guilty and you have to prove your innocence.

Race Equality

Equality to all different races as special races by change the word from Human Race to Human Races to give respect to all races on the planet.

Indigenous Rights For All Races All Over The World.

United Nations Indigenous Laws Declaration, Article 26 states that
"indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories, and resources they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired. Entire country."

The majority of the world's population are indigenous to the lands they live on or their ancestor homelands, for example, the Chinese are indigenous to China, the Black population of North Western Africa are indigenous to that region, Whites Caucasians are indigenous to Europe and Arab Caucasians are indigenous to the Middle East and North Africa.  The United Nations indigenous laws should give equal rights to all racial groups that are the original inhabitants who lived in the region for thousands of years.

Equality Rights for Cultural or Racial homogeneous Populations

The following qoate from: International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition), 2020

"Inasmuch as cultural homogeneity is valued, along with a strong identity and confidence in the continuation of traditional patterns of language, custom, value, lifestyle, and standard of living, immigrants may be perceived as intruders and outsiders who can threaten the process of creation and evolution of nation-states ".

When a population of people become the majority are homogeneous on inhabited regions once before is the indigenous people of that land, but now the majority are homogeneous, those homogeneity people should still have rights to some land, which prolongs self-determination. 

 Japan Western China, Australia, Newzealand, South America.

 Remove Political Parties

Most people know political parties do not represent people and they start many wars. We much learn from George Washington who fort against English ruling America, and helped The United States becoming a independent nation.

Screenshot 11private con l

 Screenshot 11george wast

"Either you will control your government, or government will control you.
- Ronald Reagan"

It is clear that politicians do not represent the people and the current conservative political system in western countries is not working.  They enact party policies without voter consultation, which has resulted in a dictatorial socialist system of government that denies We The People a voice that represents us in the mainstream media and in government. The power of a political institution should come from the power of its people.  We, therefore, need a better, inclusive system of government to serve the needs of all our nations to represent us. 

The system of direct democracy is one for strong consideration, such as that used in Switzerland.

Change must start at the grassroots level because political parties rarely listen to the people and we some good example of bad government.

Policial parties promote the following:

Agenda 21 is a program run by the United Nations to gain control of all land and countries under the guise of "sustainable development". It is a part of the New World Order program and universal government approach that they have been working on for a number of years. Agenda 21 has now been superseded by Agenda 2030 (see below).  The promotion of Agenda 21 is a way to ensure the destruction of all private property ownership, including farms, houses, and business and to reduce world population.  It will remove and destroy all constitutions, restrict free speech and disarm the people.  When Agenda 21 is fully realized the United Nations will be in possession of all guns and subsequently there will be no opposition to their control.

Screenshot 11belly

by TrueBlue Observer|Published November 17, 2018

Truth Is Treason In An Empire Of Lies

 The United Nation law on persecution, I quote:

"Everyone has the right to enjoy freedom from persecution."

During history every race Blacks, Asians, Whites Gentiles and white Jews have been persecuted.

Genocide Rights

United Nations Treaty: Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide I quote:

“…acts committed with the intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national ethnic, racial or religious group…”

Many Governments all over the world use the media, and anti-People organizations are campaigning and some promote genocide by man-made diseases, wars, false flags, mind condition, Whites, Blacks, Asians by reducing their birth rates and taking their rights away, flooding their countries with non natives, and promotion of interracial marriage.

What is discrimination?

The law protects everyone from unfair discrimination and sexual harassment in many aspects of their lives. If you are treated unfairly because you happen to belong to a particular group of people, you have been discriminated against and you have the right to lodge a complaint.

United Nations International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination I quote:

" Considering that all human beings are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law against any discrimination and against any incitement to discrimination"

The law protects everyone from unfair discrimination and sexual harassment in many aspects of their lives. If you are treated unfairly because you happen to belong to a particular group of people, you have been discriminated against and you have the right to lodge a complaint.

If Blacks, Asians, and Whites Caucasians campaigned against their genocide and the destruction of their culture, and their nation, they are labeled as racist.  When they disagree openly with affirmative action and busing, this is considered racism and bigotry.  The United Nations are breaking their own laws.

United Nations Indigenous Laws Declaration I quote:

"indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired. Entire country."

The majority of the world's population are indigenous to the lands they preside over.  For example, the Chinese are indigenous to  Eastern China, the Black population of North Western Africa are indigenous to that region, Whites are indigenous to Europe and White Arab are indigenous to the Middle East and areas of North Africa.

The United Nations indigenous laws should give equal rights to all racial groups who are the original inhabitants who have lived in the region for thousands of years. 

 Elected Police Chief in each state.

Sheriff In The United States Are Elected by the people.

What Do Our Elected Officials Do? I quote:

"Sheriffs are charged with preservation of peace and also serve legal documents. They are officers of the County Court transporting inmates to and from prison or jail to Court. Every county in Vermont has a Sheriff’s Department. Towns without police departments often contract with the Sheriff’s Department for law enforcement. Most sheriffs are certified law enforcement officers. They have a four-year term ".

To help you understand what the duties of a sheriff is, let’s say, for example you have a sheriff is a head of all the police departments in the state of victory and he is given a order by the primer to restrict rally’s, to invade people’s homes, to abuse people’s rights, he can say to the premiere I am elected by the people to be their police representative for four years, I will follow the rules of the constitution. Therefore I will not order police to restrict rallies and restrict people’s right to assemble and free speech, and the state and the federal government will not have any right to force the sheriff not to follow the Consitution.

The policials have control of the police and use police to control t we the people and we need to to some powers on the police by elected Sheriff to controll the police in each State by police standing for election every for years.

The Federal and state governments have control of the police and use police to control the republic and we need to have some powers working with the police to make some laws and by elected Sheriff to control the police in each state by Senior Police Officer standing for election every four years.

 Any policeman can summit in policies and ideas to improve the laws and the majority of people must vote on.

The People's Bank

Screenshot 5people own banks

People's Banking (needs fixing)

The commonwealth bank in Australia past in the past was  sometimes referred to as the people's bank; it was sold off by the Australian government, without permission of the Australian people.  In each country, the people should have their own bank, were the majority of the people and members of the public should be elected for a period to be a commission adviser to the bank. The people should elect the head of the bank for four years.

A few people do not realize that the commonwealth bank of Australia paid for the cost of the Australian government fighting for the second world war, and after the war was over, Australia had no debt.

 Screenshot 3turn to lie

The people's media

We need to remove the Globalists race haters from controlling the mainstream media, internet, and to make changes. We need to build community-based organizations and build national, international media, TV & newspaper, and social media to represent we the people. Written in the bill of rights will have a fair game in these platforms. 

We need to break the monopolies of Alphabet Inc, and we need to set up national and regigion social sites that we the people control by the majority vote we a elected ceo who will stand for four years. 

We the people need to have media, Internet, television, radio, and newspapers run and owned by "we the people". We need to nationalize some of the large media companies and hand them over to "we the people" to run. We all have a say through referenda explaining exactly what we want to see promoted in the media, and we have a commission where members of the public are elected to a commission to advise the media, ceo, who was also elected for four years to be the representative of we the people. 

 The ABC and SBS are are  governemt financed and need to we the run.

 

 

 

 

U.S. Bill of Rights

On September 25, 1789, Congress transmitted to the state Legislatures twelve proposed amendments to the Constitution. Numbers three through twelve were adopted by the states to become the United States (U.S.) Bill of Rights, effective December 15, 1791.

James Madison proposed the U.S. Bill of Rights. It largely responded to the Constitution's influential opponents, including prominent Founding Fathers, who argued that the Constitution should not be ratified because it failed to protect the basic principles of human liberty. The U.S. Bill of Rights was influenced by George Mason's 1776 Virginia Declaration of Rights, the 1689 English Bill of Rights, works of the Age of Enlightenment pertaining to natural rights, and earlier English political documents such as the Magna Carta (1215).

Two additional articles were proposed to the States; only the final ten articles were ratified quickly and correspond to the First through Tenth Amendments to the Constitution. The first Article, dealing with the number and apportionment of U.S. Representatives, never became part of the Constitution. The second Article, limiting the ability of Congress to increase the salaries of its members, was ratified two centuries later as the 27th Amendment. Though they are incorporated into the document known as the "Bill of Rights", neither article establishes a right as that term is used today. For that reason, and also because the term had been applied to the first ten amendments long before the 27th Amendment was ratified, the term "Bill of Rights" in modern U.S. usage means only the ten amendments ratified in 1791.

The United States Bill of Rights plays a central role in American law and government, and remains a fundamental symbol of the freedoms and culture of the nation. One of the original fourteen copies of the U.S. Bill of Rights is on public display at the National Archives in Washington, D.C.

Read the Bill of Rights:

Amendment I (1): Freedom of religion, speech, and the press; rights of assembly and petition
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II (2): Right to bear arms
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III (3): Housing of soldiers
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV (4): Search and arrest warrants
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V (5): Rights in criminal cases
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

Amendment VI (6): Rights to a fair trial
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII (7): Rights in civil cases
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII (8): Bails, fines, and punishments
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX (9): Rights retained by the people
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X (10): Powers retained by the states and the people
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Back To Top

 

U.S. Pocket Constitution Book

To learn more about the Constitution — the people, the events, the landmark cases — order a copy of “The U.S. Constitution & Fascinating Facts About It” today!

Call to order: 1-800-887-6661 or order pocket constitution books online.

© Oak Hill Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

Oak Hill Publishing Company. Box 6473, Naperville, IL 60567
For questions or comments about this site please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.