A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state.

Richard Proctor Why You NEED A Militia

The United States Constitution guarantees free speech and the right to bear arms, also known as the first and second amendments of the constitution.

The Second Amendment of the Constitution states:

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The militia organizations in the United States is privately run and includes both members of the public and those with military and law enforcement backgrounds.  These experienced leaders have often,  during their careers, maintained, organized and trained military forces.  These private militias on occasions, when deemed appropriate by the Governor, help provide military assistance to civil authorities by coordinating timely and effective ground response during states of emergency.

The mainstream socialist left wing media has been working to create a negative image of these private militias to the public.  Most people see these groups as crooks who are both extremist, power hungry and racist.

The reality, however, is very different as you can see from the below quote taken from the Texas Militia website:

"Militias are not in favor of having another revolution in America. We are for restoring a literal interpretation of the United States Constitution as the founding fathers intended with a strong emphasis on the bill of rights, states rights, and a limited federal government. Militias are not illegal. Militias are not anti-government. Militias are authorized by the US Constitution."

Intolerant governments fear their own people and they are continuously trying to take away citizens rights regarding gun ownership.  Once guns are removed, it means the socialist dictatorship can then do as they please.   Private people power who are well trained and armed are the socialists worst nightmare.

Before the Second World War, the Japanese had the idea of invading the USA.  After careful consideration and analysis of the US armed forces and its citizens, they decided against it.  The Japanese realized that the US had a huge number of citizens who are trained and know how to use weapons, and this force can not be discounted.  When you consider there are 270 million guns held by the general public, it is effectively a free army of approximately 50 million citizens which the government did not have to pay a cent towards.

The militia groups in the US today gather locally to complete military training, and generally, have a good time with other like-minded people.  These local groups include both men and women and there is no age limit or restrictions on membership.  Some of these local groups use their skills to help their local community.  Some are active along the Mexican-US border trying to stop illegal's from entering the country.  They also often play an active role on behalf of the local governments during riots.  

We would like to promote and encourage the idea that military groups should be established in Western Countries because many people believe that our political party governments are no more than genocide terrorists.  Having a citizen military presence is a sound political and military strategy, that covers the people under deterrence theory meaning, both the government and the people have to respect one another, as breaking trust will result in mutual destruction on both sides.

Presently, these militias do not have the power to arrest illegal's from crossing over the Mexico border into the US.  We also propose that these groups be given some limited powers so they can complete citizens arrests and get compensated for their time assisting their community.

Useful Videos and Links

America's Militia's" Why the FED Fear Us!

United States Militia Facebook

Discovery Channel Watchmen Militia Rising

Texas Militia Project

The New American Revolution: You Are Not Alone

Why Switzerland Has The Lowest Crime Rate in the World

When thinking about the mass extermination camps of a holocaust think..

The key to freedom is to be able to have the ability to defend yourself &, if you dont have the tools to do that, then youre going to be at the mercy of whomever wants to put you away.

Guns are deeply rooted within Swiss culture - but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept.

The country has a population of six million, but there are estimated to be at least two million publicly-owned firearms, including about 600,000 automatic rifles and 500,000 pistols.

This is in a very large part due to Switzerland's unique system of national defence, developed over the centuries.

Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year throughout most of their lives.

Between the ages of 21 and 32 men serve as frontline troops. They are given an M-57 assault rifle and 24 rounds of ammunition which they are required to keep at home.

Once discharged, men serve in the Swiss equivalent of the US National Guard, but still have to train occasionally and are given bolt rifles. Women do not have to own firearms, but are encouraged to.

Update 28th December 2010:

Share this video with people who want to know why we want guns for safety. Bad guys fears when we are armed.

Proof That Guns Save Lives

1/12/2015

"Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries, asylum from persecution."
Article 14 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights

If you flood a country which has indigenous people with a different people, you are committing genocide by default.

In 1954 the UK signed up to the Refugee Convention, and today almost every country is bound by this international law.

Under the law, anyone has the right to seek asylum and the UK Government has an obligation not to forcibly return anyone to a country where they have a genuine fear of being persecuted.

The right to seek asylum is completely separate to the issue of immigration.

There is no human right to immigration, so fair and non-discriminatory limits can be placed on economic migration.

But the right to seek asylum can never be limited.

From the Liberty website regarding Asylum and Borders:

"Human rights, including the right not to be subjected to degrading treatment; the right to privacy and family life; the right to free expression and protest etc, apply to all human beings. These rights do not depend on citizenship. Some of the UK's immigration and asylum policies have undermined these basic rights, including the flooding of indigenous white, African and Asian countries, which is leading to genocide."

Merkel's right-wing opposition AfD Party in Germany says she belongs in Court for promoting the non-European invasion into Europe

Watch: Merkel’s Right-Wing Opposition Says She Belongs in Court

Lying Asylum Seekers

The vast majority of asylum seekers moving to Europe today are economic migrants though they claim asylum. They learn from others how to abuse the system to gain entry to the country and receive government benefits. After they have settled in they bring their relations into the country and have many babies. Many do not work and there are much evidence and data to show that many engage in criminal activity.

We know that most people who claim asylum to gain entry into countries have destroyed their own identification papers so it becomes their word against border guards and due to fear of "political correctness" and media scandals, western countries give leniency and allow them in. For example, the illegal boat immigrants moving to Australia in most cases will come without any passports or documentation and even though they are in most cases abusing the system due to the asylum claim they are taken into the country.

In Europe, they travel by boat from North Africa to southern Europe or they cross the border from Turkey into Greece and then move on to the country they want to live in - in most cases Britain, Germany and Sweden as these nations are seen to have the "best" migrant benefits. This movement within Europe is made possible due to the no borders agreements between the majority of European countries.  Britain has more restrictive policies and borders however even these are simple enough to get around when you have the lure of great economic prosperity cheering you on.

Lying Nigerian Asylum Seeker
Nigerian asylum seeker called "Benson" (who has only a toothbrush) cheats his way into the UK and possibly Europe.

Immigration Reversal

Europe is allowing asylum seekers from every country in the world to go there and live. This is just the first step in a process that spells the end of the European people and culture.  After allowing large numbers of migrant invaders without skills into Europe you end up with a twofold problem:

• The first is that these migrants often meet and start relationships with European citizens creating interracial marriages.
• The second issue is that a large number of unemployed migrants have nothing productive to do with their time resulting in increases in violent crimes and criminal activity.  

Both of these are fundamental issues that start to erode European culture, reducing the quality of life for its citizens and introducing new religions and cultural practices to the mainstream.

This is not a problem just for Europe.  Presently China allows economic migrants from Africa into the country is large numbers.  These Africans are now often marrying Chinese women meaning that they are starting to also experience an erosion of Chinese culture and way of life.  China is currently about 50 years behind Europe but they too will experience the problems Europe is now facing.

Africa is allowing large migrations of Chinese and Indians into many countries.

We The People must unite worldwide to fight non natives invasion into countries and the results is genocide of the native people. We propose that if someone from Africa is fleeing and claiming asylum then their first point of call should be to seek asylum from a politically stable country also on the African continent that preferably has the race and holds similar religious beliefs.  The same principle should be practiced with Middle Eastern countries.  In the case of Syria, those refugees should be resettled in other politically stable Middle Eastern countries such as Turkey or Saudi Arabia.

Western people give huge sums of money to foreign aid each year. This money can be used to encourage countries to take these people and if they wish to come back to our country, jail should be enforced.

United Nations Genocide Laws

Genocide definition:
The deliberate killing of a group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.

The multicultural, multiracial society means genocide and promoting interracial marriages means the genocide of all pure racial groups worldwide. This is GENOCIDE by DEFAULT as a flow-on effect. It is not immediately visible as a violent act of genocide but is gradualism.

The Globalist media and the so-called race relations commissions and governments are promoting the destruction of homogeneous racial groups worldwide including Australian Aborigines, Africans, Asians, European Jews, and European gentiles.

The anti-Semitic Zionist Marxist media gives positive attention to and regularly presents an interracial marriage between whites and blacks - this is a means of conditioning us.

United Nations promotes  Agent 21 Replacement Migration (Invasion) into Europe and is breaking its own laws

Understanding UN Population Migration Agenda

EXCLUSIVE: Democrat / UN Plan To Trigger U.S. Civil War Discovered, Emergency Message To 45

About European Genocide

The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

"In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

This convention defines genocide as:

“…acts committed with the intent to destroy in whole or in part, a national ethnic, racial or religious group…”

OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL ADVISER ON THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE (OSAPG)

OSAPG legal definition of genocide:

Genocide is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

The Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Convention

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948 as General Assembly Resolution 260. The Convention entered into force on 12 January 1951.  It defines genocide in legal terms and is the culmination of years of campaigning by lawyer Raphael Lemkin. Yair Auron writes "When Raphael Lemkin coined the word genocide in 1944 he cited the 1915 annihilation of Armenians as a seminal example of genocide." All participating countries are advised to prevent and punish actions of genocide in war and in peacetime. The number of states that have ratified the convention is currently 142.  See this article for more information.

What Is Genocide?

What is the Definition of Genocide?

United Nations promotes genocide by promoting the Replacement Migration into Europe

Understanding UN Population Migration Agenda

Jewish Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich said in 1952:

"WE WILL OPENLY REVEAL OUR IDENTITY WITH THE RACES OF ASIA AND AFRICA.  I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our Control Commissions will, in the interests of peace and wiping out interracial tensions."

"FORBID THE WHITES TO MATE WITH WHITES. The White Women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the White Men with black women."

"THUS THE WHITE RACE WILL DISAPPEAR, FOR THE MIXING OF THE DARK WITH THE WHITE MEANS THE END OF THE WHITE MAN, AND OUR MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY WILL BECOME ONLY A MEMORY."

Useful Links and Videos

Dumber than a White Anti-White? Part 1

Dumber than a White Anti-White? Part 2

Dumber than a White Anti-White? Part 3

AntiRacist Hitler

Whites Took Over America

Diversity Comes to Africa

After the Genocide - Rwanda

This is Europa - Say NO to White Genocide

David Duke: Stop the Genocide of European Mankind

Beefcake’s Bootcamp Episode 30: Battle Bonkers (PodCast)

Racial Program for the 20th Century Israel Cohen’s Melting Pot

THE STATEMENT OF MYRON FAGAN:

[JR’s transcript from an audio recording]

Here is documentary proof of the beginning of their deliberate plot to foment the Negroes into all their lawlessness. Around 1910, one Israel Zangwill wrote a play entitled “The Melting Pot.” It was sheer propaganda to incite the Negroes and Jews because the play purportedly visualized how the American people were discriminating against and persecuting Jews and Negroes. At that time, nobody seemed to realize that it was a propaganda play—it was that cleverly written. The propaganda was well lapped up, and the truly great entertainment in the play, and it was a big Broadway hit. Now, in those years, the legendary Diamond Jim Brady used to throw a banquet at the famous Delmonico Restaurant in New York, after the opening performance of a popular play. He threw such a party for the cast of “The Melting Pot,” its author, producer and chosen Broadway celebrities. By then I already made a personal mark on the Broadway theater, and was invited to that party. There I met George Bernard Shaw and a Jewish writer named Israel Cohen. Zangwill, Shaw and Cohen were the triumvirate who created the Fabian Society in England and had worked closely with a Frankfurt Jew named Mordechai who had changed his name to Karl Marx. But remember, at that time both Marxism and Communism were just emerging and nobody paid much attention to either, and nobody suspected the propaganda in the writings of those three really brilliant writers.

At that banquet, Israel Cohen told me he was then engaged in writing a book which was to be a follow-up on Zangwill’s “The Melting Pot.” The title of his book was to be A Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century. At that time, I was completely absorbed by my work as a playwright, and significant as that title was, its real objective never dawned on me, nor was I interested in reading the book. But it suddenly hit me with the force of a hydrogen bomb when I received a newspaper clipping of an item published by the Washington, D.C. Evening Star in May 1957. That item was a verbatim reprint of the following excerpt in Israel Cohen’s book, A Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century, and it reads as I quote:

"We must realize that our Party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will instill in the Whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

That same excerpt was entered into the Congressional Record of June 7, 1957, by Representative Thomas B. Abernathy. Thus, the authenticity of that passage in Cohen’s book was fully established. But the one question that remained in my mind was whether it represented the official policy or plot of the Communist Party, or just a personal expression of Cohen himself. Hence I sought more proof, and I found it. In an official pamphlet published in 1935 by the New York Communist Party’s official Workers’ Library Publishers, that pamphlet was entitled, “The Negroes in a Soviet America.” It urged the Negroes to rise up, form a Soviet state in the South, and apply for admission to the Soviet Union. It contained a firm pledge that the revolt would be supported by all American Reds and all so-called liberals. On page 38, it promised that a Soviet government would confer greater benefits to Negroes than to Whites, and again this official Communist pamphlet pledged that, I quote, “any act of discrimination or prejudice against a Negro will become a crime under the revolutionary law,” unquote. That statement proved that the excerpt in Israel Cohen’s book, published in 1913, was an official edict of the Communist Party and directly in line with the Illuminati blueprint for world revolution issued by Weishaupt and later by Albert Pike.

*          *          *          *          *          *          *          *          *          *          *          *

The following link has the audio of this passage, starting at 3:00 in. “The rise of Satan's illuminati Dajjal Antichrist system 7/8” was added to YouTube on 9/3/07:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrWWrSE-0Ew

Immigration Control Platform

Trump should remove us from ALL UN mandates such as the war on drugs, the war on terror, and the bio-geo-engineering of the planet. The UN thinks it's a global government over every sovereign country. Abolish the UN and outlaw any future attempts at world government. The UN is what divides the world.

24/11/2015

Muslims Invade Europe

The Truth About Migrants (2018)

European governments are actively destroying the European Caucasian way of life by allowing large numbers of third world immigrants, most of whom are not genuine refugees into the continent.  The reality is that most of these "refugees" are strategically using the Syrian crisis as a way of sneaking in illegally, and have thrown away their passports and legal papers in order to get into Europe under false pretenses. 

Their reason for coming is simple.  They are primarily here for financial gain as most European countries have generous welfare and refugee benefits ensuring that they can be set up in a far superior lifestyle than one in the Middle East, and as an extra bonus, they do not even have to work for it!  These are illegal economic migrants, and instead of taking a hard line on this type of immigration, the European Governments are, for the most part, are letting them in with welcoming arms and little to no checking.  This is pure madness and will lead to the eventual destruction of the European civilization.

Sometime in the future, when the historians sit down and analyze the situation, they will print out history books that show the European leaders of today, committing democide against their own people. Democide is the term used when a government actively commits genocide on their own people.  Under United Nations law, this is a criminal offense and it is also a type of racism, (again not allowed under UN laws), by discriminating against their own people.

Merkel's right-wing opposition AfD Party in Germany says she belongs in court for the Non-European invasion into Europe.

Watch: Merkel’s Right-Wing Opposition Says She Belongs in Court

It is a clear example of political correctness gone mad, and anyone who dares so much as question the wisdom of this decision is attacked, persecuted and vilified.  The socialist controlled media labels these citizens as "racist, extremist, far right, islamophobes" just to name a few and the more they promote this image, the more other moderate Europeans shut off this type of thinking as they do not also want to attract this type of label. It's a brilliant strategy in order to clamp down any opposition before it takes root.

Thanks to the internet and the ease of social media and video sharing, the people of the world are really starting to realize that we do not have a government that looks after its people. More and more citizens of Europe are choosing to ignore government edict and choosing to empower themselves.  In France, it is presently against the law to protest against the influx of immigrants into the country, however, these protests are still happening and encouragingly growing in numbers.  Citizens are now taking matters into their own hand, with illegal migrant camps, and houses being attacked almost daily and some are even attacking the boats that are coming across from Turkey to Greece.

If you look at mainstream media you will see beautiful, sorrowful images of families and young children crying tears of relief at landing in Europe and safety.  And right next to them you will see welcoming groups of Europeans smiling with open arms ready to help and accept them into Europe.  This image has been carefully imagined and is, quite frankly, nothing more than propaganda and in no way in alignment with the citizens of Europe.  The discrepancy of these two images is becoming so difficult to contain that even the mainstream news sites are now showing everyday footage of new protests happening in Europe and while they are still painting them as the minority, it's clear that their propaganda is starting to fail.

It is interesting to note, that the terrorist attack in Paris occurred on Thursday night, 13 November 2015.  This is being touted as a crazy conspiracy theory but you have to admit that the uncountable timing and location is just too staged.  For more details on this, see France Paris Terrorist Attack November, 13th, 2015

The European governments the United Nations are breaking their own laws in broad daylight and we, as citizens of Europe, and the world is sitting by and letting it happen.  They do not represent our people at all and we must start building our own united organizations as a way forward in order to resist and ensure we remain represented. 

If we do not do this for ourselves and our children we simply have no future.  When we are protesting it is important to remember,  we are not just fighting for Europeans, we are the pathfinders fighting for everyone on this planet so it is people who can have self-determination and rights.

Recent Videos & News Articles

Jihad Central:  Brussels Became A Terror Hot Spot Because Of A Socialist Mayor’s Immigration Ideology

The Truth About Islam

Paris Massacre:  A Product of Muslim Ghettos

Big rise in German attacks on migrant homes in 2015

Insider:  EU-U.S. Must Take More Refugees, Get Rid of Sovereignty

European Civilization Is Doomed

50,000 Nationalists March in Poland

Footage of Polish Nationalist March

Germany:  One Invader Rape Every Three Days

German Girls Must Cover Arms and Legs to Appease Syrian “Refugees”

Beheading Threatened Live on TV in Hungary

24/11/2016

Sheriff’s (police) are elected by the people to protect them in the United States.

  Sheriff Mack Power of the County Sheriff Part 1

Power of the County Sheriff

If you watch a western movie you may have noticed that people appoint a sheriff and if the sheriff is not good the people get rid of them.  To many people, their first thoughts on Sheriffs are related to the story of Robin Hood who stole from the rich to give to the poor.  The Sheriff in this story is the villain and the position is portrayed as one of absolute power who terrorized the poor serfs by taking more and more taxes and deserving everything Robin Hood dishes out to him.   

There is growing evidence that we need to rethink our policing and law enforcement system because currently the police in Western Countries no longer represent the people, but instead, they are taking their orders from the New World Order Globalists who want to create a multicultural society and to genocide all of the racial groups.  The position of Sheriff in the United States is a good place to start.

Many policemen in the United States don't know the American constitution, and because of this, they abuse the laws which they are supposed to uphold.  It is time for people to start campaigning for sheriffs to be elected to represent and work for the people, as presently, the political crooks who run our countries currently have full control of them.  One of the glaring problems within the current system is, law enforcement agents are purposefully turning a blind eye to any crimes committed against Europeans by other groups.  

Some examples:

• Grooming of British girls by Muslim men in Britain.  The police, politicians, and media have been turning a blind eye on this issue for many years.
• Police in the United States have been turned into soldiers and told to dress and act like soldiers.  Some have become quite brutal and have been taught very bad attitudes including killing people with very little provocation.

History of the Police Sheriff

To understand the origin of Sheriffs, we must go back in time approximately 1000 years ago, in England, the term "reeve" referred to a chief of leader and the term "shire" described groups of hundreds of people banded together which is what we would call a county or town today.  So it makes sense that the leader of a shire was called the "shire reeve" who was appointed by noblemen and kings to maintain the peace and order of their community.  

This term in time evolved into the word "sheriff", and came into existence around the ninth century which makes the sheriff the oldest continuing non-military, law enforcement entity in world history.

United States

Sheriffs in the United States have the same power and do the same job as the police, with the key difference being Sheriffs in the US are elected by the people in the majority of states.  Many Sheriffs stand up to the Federal Government on behalf of their state when they feel the politicians are passing laws which are in conflict with the US constitution.  In the US police, sheriffs and the military currently give an oath that they will abide and follow the constitution.

A Sheriff acts in a role similar to one of a police chief in a municipal department.  Deputies serve under the sheriff in a role similar to that of uniformed police officers.  The sheriff usually has jurisdiction over any unincorporated areas of his or her county.  Their duties include:

•  Investigating complaints.
•  Emergency response.
•  Patrolling.
•  Resolving disputes.
•  Arresting suspects.
•  Criminal investigation.
•  Executing warrant.

 High Sheriffs of England

Originally Sheriffs wielded a large amount of power, however, this has been reduced over the centuries as new roles were created including the Exchequer, High Court Judges, and Coroner.  In the present day, the role is really more of a figurehead position and new High Sheriffs are appointed annually.  Appointees to the title of High Sheriff are usually held by individuals who are financially well off as there is absolutely no remuneration.  The responsibilities include:

•  To uphold the ancient Office of High Sheriff and to make a contribution to the High Sheriff’s County during the term of office.
•  Supporting the Constitution within their county including the Royal Family, the Judiciary, the Police and other law enforcement agencies.
•  To ensure the welfare of visiting High Court Judges and the Lord-Lieutenant and to offer them hospitality when appropriate.
•  Supporting and promoting the voluntary sector and giving all possible encouragement to the voluntary organizations within a County.

Australia

Historically the role of the Sheriff played a key part in law enforcement in Australia.  Records from 1824 show the role was responsible for many duties including:

•  Execution of all judgments, decrees, and orders of the Supreme Court.
•  Carry out any death sentences as well as all minor sentences passed by the Court.
•  Discharge the duties of the Coroner and act as the Marshal of the Admiralty.
•  Arrange for the transmission of prisoners, run the jails, and arrange the reception and disposal of prisoners returned from penal settlements.

Over time policies changed most notably, the abolition of the death penalty and the Sheriff position became less important within the Australian law enforcement system. The responsibilities of the Sheriff today are very different and include:

•  Administration of the Sheriff’s Office.
•  Serve enforcement orders, warrants and summons for the Supreme, District, and Local Courts.
•  Serve and enforce orders on behalf of Commonwealth courts, including the High Court, Federal Court and the Family Court of Australia.
•  Provide security for the Supreme Court, District Court, certain Local Courts and a range of tribunal.

Changing the Current System

The current policing system is not working and in most western countries it is filled with corruption and political strangleholds.  It is vitally important that we create a system which represents "we the people" and this starts with each town or county voting in the leader of their law enforcement.  Like in the US, the people voted position of Sheriff can then work with local courts and lawyers to make appropriate laws that ensure the safety of citizens while still allowing them their civil liberties.  

By looking at people-based democratic systems, such as Switzerland's Direct Democracy, all members of the public can choose to oppose or approve the laws introduced by both the Sheriff and citizens.  The majority vote of a proposed law should then elect members of the community to work closely with the supreme court so this law can be brought into legislation.

The role of Sheriff should be a position of authority which also takes over the responsibility of the police force, and we recommend it be held by members who have a good background in law enforcement such as police officers.  When the Sheriff and police have the ability to bypass the government when they disagree with their policies via the direct democracy system, this empowers our citizens and law enforcement body ensuring the two have complete cooperation.

Useful Links & Videos

The History of the Office of Sheriff

First Amendment Cop Gets Props

History Of The Sheriff - Camden County

Washington State Sheriffs' Association

Dublin Sheriff’s Office Occupied in Protest at Killiney Eviction

Utah Sheriffs Warn Obama They Are Willing To Die To Protect The Constitution

UA Colorado Sheriff Owns President Obama

Police Chief "I Will Take My Uniform Off and Stand with Freedom"

24/11/2015