Japan & Germany is a Jewish colony since 1945
Comment: Ukraine, Britain, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Europe are mainly Jewish Globalist colonies and the people are slaves.
The West intentionally are covering up the Israelis war crimes by the generic statement: ISRAEL HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF. They painted the Palestinians succefully as terrorists. Killing terrorists is good?
The USA, and Mosad were in on the 9/11 airline hijacking, and explosions of the WTC? Saudi "terrorists" were involved, and Iraq was bombed? Such a huge lie is 22 years old, but, the world doesn't know it or refuse to learn it
Filthy dirty and self appointed gods chosen ones just need wiped out. As a race( they are mainly white people), they have shown the world that they are scum, vermin that need to be taken out. PERSONALLY I have no love of them and think that little england should never have allowed them to form with the world watching, and as the vermin took hold, they infiltrated America to control it crying to the world about how they suffered genocide. The Israelis that are on the battlefield (which they created) are known as cowards who are only good at murdering civilians and as such, when I hear of an Israeli being killed...I open a beer and toast the guy that pulled the trigger. This is my personal opinion.
The usa keeps helping/protecting israel because most of usa congress is citizen of israel.
JewNazis gotta act #Zionist again! ??
The Israeli Boycott Is Working ... And It's Devastating ... And Of Course ... The Media Is Hiding It !!!
Edited
The real jews support Palestine. resistor7
US and Israel working hand in hand in maintaining the illegal Palestinian occupation apartheid and the Gaza genocide!
Edited
Edited
Al Jazeera is not telling you the truth in this video. Jews mainly run Al Jazeera and the United States.
The United States is Jewish Run
All the Jews Biden has tapped for top roles in his new administration
US President Joe Biden filled the months before Inauguration Day lining up a slate of Cabinet secretaries, assistants and advisers, many of them Jewish.
Biden’s choices reflect a diverse cross-section of American Jewry and possess expertise gleaned from decades of experience in government, science and medicine and law.
Here’s a rundown of the Jewish names you should know as the Biden administration begins.
Blinken, a longtime Biden adviser with an extensive diplomacy resume, is the stepson of a Holocaust survivor whose stories shaped his worldview and subsequently his policy decisions, including in the Middle East. He holds mainstream Democratic views about Israel and said during his confirmation hearing Tuesday that he wants the US to reenter the Iran nuclear deal — and that he would consult with Israel on Iran policy.
Cohen, who has long been involved in Jewish causes and issues, will occupy the job he held under President Barack Obama. He does not require confirmation, meaning that Biden’s CIA has a top expert in Iran issues from Day One.
Garland was blocked from joining the Supreme Court in the last year of the Obama administration. Now, he’ll require Senate confirmation to become the country’s top lawyer. In his speech after being nominated, he credited his grandparents, who fled anti-Semitism in Europe before coming to the US.
Haines was deputy director of the CIA under Obama and Biden reportedly considered her to run that agency. Her mother was the Jewish painter Adrian Rappin (originally Rappaport), and her non-Jewish father once wrote in an account about a trip with Haines to Israel that the nominee identifies as Jewish.
Klain, a longtime Biden aide who was the president-elect’s first major appointment in November, was previously chief of staff to Biden in his vice president days and to Vice President Al Gore. He has maintained ties with his childhood synagogue in Indianapolis, where he famously learned multiple Torah portions for his bar mitzvah, and has spoken about his commitment to raising Jewish children.
Lander, a leading geneticist, will require Senate confirmation after Biden elevated his position to the Cabinet level. After he was criticized for toasting James Watson, the scientist who is credited with discovering the shape of DNA and who also expressed racist and sexist views, Lander said he, too, had been the subject of anti-Semitic comments by Watson.
Levine, raised in a Conservative Jewish home in Massachusetts, is Pennsylvania’s health secretary. She is the first known transgender person to be nominated for a position that requires Senate confirmation.
Mayorkas, 60, the deputy secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama, was born in Cuba to a Cuban Jewish father and Romanian Jewish mother who survived the Holocaust. He has worked closely with Jewish groups and spoken often about the specific threats facing American Jews. An array of Jewish groups sought a swift confirmation given the threat of extremist violence surrounding the presidential transition, but a Republican senator who supported overturning the election results blocked that possibility on Tuesday.
An Orthodox Jew originally from Brooklyn and educated through college in Orthodox schools, Neuberger has worked at the NSA for more than a decade. She helped establish the US Cyber Command and worked as chief risk officer, where she led the agency’s election security efforts for the 2018 midterms.
Sherman was the lead negotiator for the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and took the lead in advocating for the agreement with the Jewish and pro-Israel communities, later describing tensions with Israel and some American Jewish groups over the deal as “very, very painful.” She has also played a role in hewing the Democratic Party platform to traditional pro-Israel lines.
Yellen already made history as the first woman chair of the Federal Reserve, but now she has been appointed to be the first female Treasury secretary. The respected centrist was one of three Jews featured in a 2016 Trump attack ad that reflected longstanding anti-Semitic tropes.
Walensky is married to Loren D. Walensky, also a physician-scientist. They ...
The media in The United States is run mainly by Jewish Globalist.
Well the IDF blew up 2 of their soldiers the other day when they demolished a tunnel - just like they kill Israeli citizens. Rabid dogs. They kill 10 Israeli citizens to get 1 Hamas Hero.
White girl killed in Israel Gaza war.
Always amazed that people think war doesn't kill children. This is a consequence of war. On 07/10/2023, the population in Gaza danced out of joy because Israeli children and civilians had been slaughtered. Now they have a taste of their own medicine. Anyone who thinks that children are spared is mistaken. An eye for an eye.
All British MPs approve of her death and indeed have sent Britishg warships to protect the occupiers of Palestine to ensure the murders can continue.
¨For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces¨ https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/ Video: Israeli reserve colonel says Oct 7 killings were ‘mass Hannibal’ directive by IDF, not Hamas (The Hannibal Directive orders the army to kill their own to prevent them being taken captive.) https://skwawkbox.org/2023/11/20/video-israeli-reserve-colonel-says-oct-7-killings-were-mass-hannibal-directive-by-idf-not-hamas/
Israeli PM/war criminal Netenyahu ordered the IDF and Israeli Air force to stand down for 7 hours on Oct 7th https://twitter.com/LaurenWitzkeDE/status/1713344613409313003
Former IDF-Israel did not respond to the attack for many hours. How is this possible? https://rumble.com/v3p80xd-israel-did-not-respond-to-the-attack-for-many-hours.-how-is-this-possible-e.html
Hamas charter-(no wipe jews from earth clause) https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-2017-document-full
Do you REALLY think Hamas blew up 100s of cars with bullets, while busy raping beheaded babies?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1T51_iroHo
Israel using children as human sheilds, again
Israel restricts calories into Gaza.
MINIMUM of calories per person to enter gaza, so that wasnt hamas either,
remember that time when When Zionists made deal with the Nazis? https://www.jpost.com/Features/When-Zionists-made-deal-with-the-Nazis
The zionist terroist wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_political_violence
A hidden universe of suffering’: the Palestinian children sent to jail https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/21/a-hidden-universe-of-suffering-the-palestinian-children-sent-to-jail
BARCODES STARTING W/ 729 MEAN ITS ISRAELI. BOYCOTT THEM FOREVER!
The BBC has always been known as the Globalist Bullsh1t Corporation hereabouts. I wonder why these 'Journalists' who complain are working for such a biased organisation anyway?
Jewish Zionist globalist runs Google and they promote hate for all races including Whites, Blacks, Jews and Palestines.
Usa is controlled by a zionist oligarchy, based in companies like google, evil to core . that is what makes usa give unconditional support to this renewed genocide attempt by israel. peace in palestine will only arrive when everyone from river to sea have equal rights and there is full accountability for all the crimes and dispossessions . as such colonizer racist israel is facing a sad end in the long term. if zionist colonizers want peace and security , they should go back to homes they legally own in usa and europe, and get out of palestine land.
Google is owned by Zionist and does all their dirty work, so not a surprise. Why else has youtube been turning into shit in recent years with mass censorship all across the board?
jewgle is feuled by wall st shekels instead of public service.
White Phosphorus, Torture And Other War Crimes In Gaza
All while the people behind this murder spree sit in mansions as servants fix their food and clean their toilets.
The US ( Zionist Jewish Globalist run), Israel and the accomplices; are expressing a deeply ingrained blood-lust addiction, wherein their very life and growth was and is in large part based on their stealing treasure and enslaving of peoples they proclaim inferior (untermensch, as the Nazis use to express it).
All non-jews are 'not Adam' (not human). That's what their rabbis say. onefodderunit
See Kill Pits. See Jews pushing Palestinian men into pits and shooting them. Jews are mass murdering Palestinians in Gaza not only by carpet bombing them, killing millions of children, which is bad enough, but they have blind folded men with their hands bound behind their backs they push into pits filled with tires, and shooting
So...anyone NOT is Jew is...what...a sub human, an animal ? THIS is
how THEY see you the Goy (all non jews all overthe world). THINK about that as you understand how
many Duel Citizens run you country. They run the following countries. Australia, New Zealand, United States, Canada, Britain, Ireland, Russia, Ukraine, Germany, France, Europe.
They never learn:Woe to those who devise wickedness and work evil on their beds! When the morning dawns they perform it, because it is in the power of their hand.
Anyhow, it's getting worse by the day for these demons dressed in human suits. Bolivia has severed all diplomatic ties to the terrorist state of Israhell and there will be many more to follow. This follows Yemen's declaration of war on them as I had been saying would happen for months on this channel. Bear in mind that the Houthis
Leb. Communication GrpAl Manar TV
Understanding Palestine in 10 Questions | Between the Lines with Palki Sharma
Understanding Palestine in 10 Questions | Between the Lines with Palki Sharma The story of Palestine is not a new one. It's been written and told multiple times over the last few decades. But what about the Palestine of today? Where is it? Who rules it? And what do Palestinians want. Palki Sharma explores the complex history and current issues of Palestine as we answer 10 fundamental questions about the conflict on Between the Lines.
US massive military buildup. Biden threatens Iran. EU visa for Russians to overthrow Putin. U/1
Norman Finkelstein is Jewish.
Israel's long war on Gaza w/Norman Finkelstein | The Chris Hedges Report
Israel has unleashed a horrific war of collective punishment against the people of Gaza, the latest in a long history of anti-Palestinian oppression. As corporate media shamelessly provides cover for what is undoubtedly a genocide unfolding in real time, the need to ground our understanding of the conflict in its proper history is more important than ever. Norman Finkelstein joins The Chris Hedges Report to discuss Israel's 17 year blockade of Gaza and its crucial significance to understanding the events of the past two weeks.
Brief history of Israel-Palestine conflict
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have been killed, violently displaced and forced to live under occupation for decades by Israel.
Here are the historical events that led to the shrinking of Palestinian lands and the foundation and the expansion of the state of Israel. #palestine #israel #history
0:00 Intro
0:15 Palestine in the Early 1900s
0:49 WWI and the Balfour Declaration
1:11 UN Partition Plan in 1947
1:59 First Arab-Israeli War
2:31 The Six-Day War
3:05 Palestinian Resistance
3:37 The Oslo Accords
4:56 Continuous Attacks Against Palestinians
Edited
Jews in the Middle East did not suffer problems with discrimination; however Jews in Europe did, because they created hate against White gentiles
!. Communist Jews killed millions Ukraine’s and Russians during communist rule. Jew Whites & Whites Holocaust,
2 Jewish Bankers financed Wars in Europe. Bankers Control the World . Ukraine & Israel as one Nation
3 Jewish globalists control most of the media in Europe and other white countries. Media Globalist Run. Anti-semitism
4. Many Jews are for open boards
5, Many Jews promote same sex marriages.
6. Many Jews promote race mixing.
7. Many Jews create hate against whites. White Guilt Debunked. Prof. Tony Martin: Blacks and Jews at Wellesl…
8. Many Jews do not allow whites free speech.
9. Many Jews are against whites having organizations to represent themselves.
10. Many Jews are against whites having children
11. Many Jews are behind the replacing whites with colored people in Europe, United States, Canada, Australia and Zealand. Jew admitted Jews plan to destroy Whites
12. Jews were behind the Covid jab that killed many people all over the World, including Jews, Whites goys.
15. Zionist Jews use Jews. Zionism Has Deceived And Sacraficed Jew
Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro explains what the goal of Zionism is. Why did Zionists creat...
16. Many Jews hate Christians. Moloch- Some Jews worship Moloch. Tulmud Jewish most Guarded Secret 3.
WARNING!! From an Unvaccinated Person in Israel.
Jewish testimonies about Covid jab results. The testimonies project - the mo...
Well he should have gone further, the israelites, the one and only "Jew" bloodline is only in 15% of those who "identify" as Jews today .. So who are the rest of them? Well they are White European goys and share no relation or ties to Israel. They converted to Judaism which according to the Torah is impossible. One needs a Jewish mother to be cursed with kikery . So not only do they have no ethnic claim to the land, they have no religious one either.
First, semantics. "Jew" and "Hebrew" have precise definitions and are not the same, even if both are derived from the same bloodline. From that perspective, there are a few things to consider:
- The tomb of Amenemhat I, founder of the 12th Dynasty, whom most consider to have been a usurper, is the only tomb permanently closed to [show less]
Dubai and Jews
Mufti Menk addresses controversy after iftar with Zionist rabbi in Dubai
Rabbi Duchman is still the Zionist facilitating normalisation between the UAE and Israel. And Menk sitting next to him is immensely problematic, whether he knew it or not. His reasoning that there were people of other faiths present, or that there was no indication of any demonstration of normalisation, also doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Why else would he say that had he known who Duchman was, or what he represented, he wouldn't have attended?
In other words, despite his defiance, Menk appears to have realised that Duchman's presence alone at a state-sponsored event was harmful enough. And that he played a role in lending it some gravitas.
Hours after the event, he saw how Israeli government social media accounts promoted the photos as a kind of proof that it held no animosity towards Muslims even as it attacked Palestinian worshippers at Al-Aqsa. He saw, too, how the UAE used his interaction with the Rabbi as evidence of its purported tolerance.
Unfortunately, he just can't seem to bring himself to admit it.
And that's a pity. Because if Muslim leaders aren't willing to invest time into understanding the plight of their people, they don't merely become complicit in their oppression, they normalise ignorance, too.
UAE: The ‘happiest’ little police state ever?
After all, "happy" is a rather ludicrous descriptor for an entity that is so often synonymous with the obliteration of rights. A brief glance at Human Rights Watch’s most recent overview of events in the UAE is enough to confirm that the situation is far from cheery.
For example, "UAE residents who have spoken about human rights issues are at serious risk of arbitrary detention, imprisonment, and torture" - part of Emirati authorities’ "sustained assault on freedom of expression and association".
To be sure, the UAE constitutes a land of economic opportunity for many a Western "expat" as well as other privileged sectors of the global populace.
But as HRW notes, "many low-paid migrant workers remain acutely vulnerable to forced labour", and the country’s labour law doesn’t cover domestic workers, “who face a range of abuses, from unpaid wages, confinement to the house, workdays up to 21 hours with no breaks, to physical or sexual assault by employers”.
Over the years, all manner of horror stories involving migrant worker abuse have emerged - including, as it so happens, from the construction of New York University’s oh-so-sophisticated Abu Dhabi campus and the Louvre Abu Dhabi.
In addition to exploited workers, other foreign nationals might be forgiven for finding the UAE to be a less-than-happy place. Five years ago, my Lebanese friend’s father - who had resided in the Emirates for decades with his wife and whose children were born there - was suddenly given 48 hours to leave the country, with no explanation. Though decidedly apolitical, the father happened to be Shia, which is apparently reason enough to break up UAE-based Lebanese families.
Meanwhile, all inhabitants of the UAE exist in an oppressive landscape of total surveillance. As Middle East Eye noted last year, an Emirati cybercrime law "essentially provide[s] a legal basis to detain anybody who criticises the regime online".
In Abu Dhabi, an "Israeli-installed mass civil surveillance system” known as Falcon Eye reportedly "enables Emirati security officials to monitor every person 'from the moment they leave their doorstep to the moment they return to it'".
But, hey, who said police states aren’t happy?
Nor has the UAE brought much happiness to Yemen, a country whose devastation in recent years is in large part thanks to the criminal excesses of a Saudi- and Emirati-led coalition, which have ranged from slaughtering Yemeni children on a school bus to paving the way for mass starvation.
In a recent investigation for the Guardian on “how the UAE is profiting from the chaos of civil war” in Yemen, Ghaith Abdul-Ahad writes that, while all parties to the conflict are responsible for atrocities, “no one can compete with the detentions, torture and forced disappearances by the Emirati-sponsored troops”. He continues: “An unprecedented campaign of terror followed the formation of these forces in 2016."
And while the ostensible aim of the campaign was to fight al-Qaeda, “the targets expanded to include anyone who dared to oppose the UAE presence in Yemen”.
Fitting, then, that the UAE is a primary “terror-fighting” partner of the US - another nation that regularly engages in terrorism under the guise of fighting it. Of course, the US has also fervently backed Saudi-Emirati horrors in Yemen with weapons and other forms of support.
In 2017, the Associated Press documented at least 18 secret prisons-cum-torture centres in Yemen run by the UAE or UAE-trained forces, where the US was also known to interrogate detainees. The following year, the AP ran a report identifying “at least five [Emirati] prisons where security forces use sexual torture to brutalize and break inmates”.
The country’s portrayal as an ultra-modern oasis of wealth and progress helps conceal its fundamentally anti-human orientation
In the end, the current propaganda promoting the UAE as one of the happiest places on earth is a useful smokescreen for nefarious activity both at home and abroad.
Apparently, the - ultimately empty - concept of "happiness" has been deemed a suitable substitute for freedom, human rights, and all that good stuff, while the country’s portrayal as an ultra-modern oasis of wealth and progress helps conceal its fundamentally anti-human orientation.
And since the Emirati enterprise nicely reinforces a US-led global neoliberal project that prioritises obscene socioeconomic inequality and war - while also conveniently facilitating normalisation with America’s favourite Israeli partner in crime - things will presumably only get happier.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.
Is Dubai safe for people with Jewish names or identities to visit (or live in)?
The short answer is a resounding 'yes'. I have lived in Dubai for nearly five years and can safely say that I've never had an issue with being Jewish. There is a well-known separation between religion and politics in Dubai, and so long as you aren't in breach of this separation (brandishing Zionist propaganda and openly supporting the Jewish state, for example) there isn't an issue. Further, the business friendly nature of Dubai lends itself to openness and an acceptance of all types.
I've experienced far more anti-semitism in the US and Europe than anywhere in the Middle East, and I've trav
Known as the “capital of UAE’s economy,” Dubai is a key financial and trading hub, and one of the fastest growing cities in the world.8 Helped by its strategic geographical location and “exceptional infrastructure”, Dubai has emerged as a prominent global trading city connecting markets around the world.9
In addition to its efficient infrastructure, Dubai has put in place economic policies and a legislative framework that has made it a conducive environment for over 20,000 international corporations to operate.10 Additionally, Dubai invested heavily in infrastructure and hospitality projects for the Expo 2020 trade fair, including the expansion of the Al Maktoum International Airport at an estimated cost of US$8 billion.11
Dubai Population Over The Years | Population Growth in Dubai UAE
According to the census conducted by the Statistics Centre of Dubai, the population of the emirate was 1,771,000 as of 2009, which included 1,370,000 males and 401,000 females. As of June 2017, the population is 2,789,000. The region covers 1,287.5 square kilometres (497.1 sq mi). The population density is 408.18/km2 – more than eight times that of the entire country. Dubai is the second most expensive city in the region and 20th most expensive city in the world.
As of 2013, only about 15% of the population of the emirate was made up of UAE nationals,[116] with the rest comprising expatriates, many of whom either have been in the country for generations or were born in the UAE.[117][118] Approximately 85% of the expatriate population (and 71% of the emirate's total population) was Asian, chiefly Indian (51%) and Pakistani (16%); other significant Asian groups include Bangladeshis (9%) and Filipinos (3%).
Modern Music Boeing 777 Emirates Premieră Video HD
The MAIN Reason Why Germany Lost WW2 - OIL
Oil was in desperately short supply for the Axis powers in WW2.
The MAIN Reason Why Germany Lost WW2 - OIL
Oil was in desperately short supply for the Axis powers in WW2. One historian describes it as 'The First War for Oil' - such was the severity of the shortage. Oil was probably the biggest factor that Germany lost world war 2, and it explains many of the previous reasons why the German Wehrmacht fought the way it did.
Hitler Was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England
Hitler Was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England — By Yuri Rubtsov
More than 70 years ago was the start of the greatest slaughter in history.
The recent resolution of the parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE fully equalizes the role of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany at the outbreak of the Second World War, except that it had the purely pragmatic purpose of extorting money from Russia on the contents of some of the bankrupt economies, intended to demonize Russia as the successor state to the USSR, and to prepare the legal ground for the deprivation of her right to speak out against revision of results of war.
But if we approach the problem of responsibility for the war, then you first need to answer the key question: who helped the Nazis come to power?
Who sent them on their way to world catastrophe? The entire pre-war history of Germany shows that the provision of the "necessary" policies were managed by the financial turmoil, in which, by the way, the world was plunged into.
The key structures that defined the post-war development strategy of the West were the Central financial institutions of Great Britain and the United States — the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve System (FRS) — and the associated financial and industrial organizations set out a target to establish absolute control over the financial system of Germany to control political processes in Central Europe.
To implement this strategy it is possible to allocate the following stages:
1st: from 1919 to 1924 — to prepare the ground for massive American financial investment in the German economy;
2nd: from 1924 to 1929 — the establishment of control over the financial system of Germany and financial support for national socialism;
3rd: from 1929 to 1933 — provoking and unleashing a deep financial and economic crisis and ensuring the Nazis come to power;
4th: from 1933 to 1939 — financial cooperation with the Nazi government and support for its expansionist foreign policy, aimed at preparing and unleashing a new World War.
In the first stage, the main levers to ensure the penetration of American capital into Europe began with war debts and the closely related problem of German reparations.
After the US' formal entry into the first World War, they gave the allies (primarily England and France) loans to the amount of $8.8 billion.
The total sum of war debts, including loans granted to the United States in 1919-1921, was more than $11 billion.
To solve this problem, debtor countries tried to impose a huge amount of extremely difficult conditions for the payment of reparations at the expense of Germany.
This was caused by the flight of German capital abroad, and the refusal to pay taxes led to a state budget deficit that could be covered only through mass production of unsecured Marks.
The result was the collapse of the German currency — the "great inflation" of 1923, which amounted to 578 (512%), when the dollar was worth 4.2 trillion Marks.
German Industrialists began to openly sabotage all activities in the payment of reparation obligations, which eventually caused the famous "Ruhr crisis" — Franco-Belgian occupation of the Ruhr in January 1923.
The Anglo-American ruling circles, in order to take the initiative in their own hands, waited for France to get caught up in a venturing adventure and to prove its inability to solve the problem.
US Secretary of State Hughes pointed out:
"It is necessary to wait for Europe to mature in order to accept the American proposal."
The new project was developed in the depths of "JP Morgan & Co." under the instruction of the head of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman.
At the core of his ideas was representative of the "Dresdner Bank" Hjalmar Schacht, who formulated it in March 1922 at the suggestion of John Foster Dulles (future Secretary of state in the Cabinet of President Eisenhower) and legal adviser to President W. Wilson at the Paris peace conference.
Dulles gave this note to the chief Trustee "JP Morgan & Co.", and then JP Morgan recommended that H. Schacht, M. Norman, and the last of the Weimar rulers.
In December, 1923, H. Schacht would become Manager of the Reichsbank and was instrumental in bringing together the Anglo-American and German financial circles.
In the summer of 1924, the project known as the "Dawes plan" (named after the Chairman of the Committee of experts who created it - American banker and Director of one of the banks of the Morgan group), was adopted at the London conference.
He called for halving the reparations and solved the question about the sources of their coverage. However, the main task was to ensure favorable conditions for US investment, which was only possible with stabilization of the German Mark.
To this end, the plan gave Germany a large loan of $200 million, half of which was accounted for by JP Morgan.
While the Anglo-American banks gained control not only over the transfer of German payments, but also for the budget, the system of monetary circulation and to a large extent the credit system of the country.
By August 1924, the old German Mark was replaced by a new, stabilized financial situation in Germany, and, as the researcher G.D Preparta wrote, the Weimar Republic was prepared for "the most picturesque economic aid in history, followed by the most bitter harvest in world history" — "an unstoppable flood of American blood poured into the financial veins of Germany."
The consequences of this were not slow to appear.
This was primarily due to the fact that the annual reparations were to cover the amount of debt paid by the allies, formed by the so-called "absurd Weimar circle".
The gold that Germany paid in the form of war reparations, was sold, pawned, and disappeared in the US, where it was returned to Germany in the form of an "aid" plan, who gave it to England and France, and they in turn were to pay the war debt of the United States.
It was then overlayed with interest, and again sent to Germany. In the end, all in Germany lived in debt, and it was clear that should Wall Street withdraw their loans, the country will suffer complete bankruptcy.
Secondly, although formal credit was issued to secure payment, it was actually the restoration of the military-industrial potential of the country. The fact is that the Germans were paid in shares of companies for the loans so that American capital began to actively integrate into the German economy.
The total amount of foreign investments in German industry during 1924-1929 amounted to almost 63 billion gold Marks (30 billion was accounted for by loans), and the payment of reparations — 10 billion Marks.
70% of revenues were provided by bankers from the United States, and most of the banks were from JP Morgan. As a result, in 1929, German industry was in second place in the world, but it was largely in the hands of America's leading financial-industrial groups.
"Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie", the main supplier of the German war machine, financed 45% of the election campaign of Hitler in 1930, and was under the control of Rockefeller "Standard oil".
Morgan, through "General Electric", controlled the German radio and electrical industry via AEG and Siemens (up to 1933, 30% of the shares of AEG owned "General Electric") through the Telecom company ITT — 40% of the telephone network in Germany.
In addition, they owned a 30% stake in the aircraft manufacturing company "Focke-Wulf". "General Motors", belonging to the DuPont family, established control over "Opel".
Henry Ford controlled 100% of the shares of "Volkswagen".
In 1926, with the participation of the Rockefeller Bank "Dillon, Reed & Co." the second largest industrial monopoly in Germany after "I.G. Farben" emerged — metallurgical concern "Vereinigte Stahlwerke" (Steel trust) Thyssen, Flick, Wolff, Feglera etc.
American cooperation with the German military-industrial complex was so intense and pervasive that by 1933 the key sectors of German industry and large banks such as Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank, Donat Bank etc were under the control of American financial capital.
The political force that was intended to play a crucial role in the Anglo-American plans was being simultaneously prepared. We are talking about the funding of the Nazi party and A. Hitler personally.
As former German Chancellor Brüning wrote in his memoirs, since 1923, Hitler received large sums from abroad. Where they went is unknown, but they were received through Swiss and Swedish banks.
It is also known that, in 1922 in Munich, a meeting took place between A. Hitler and the military attache of the US to Germany — Captain Truman Smith — who compiled a detailed report for his Washington superiors (in the office of military intelligence), in which he spoke highly of Hitler.
It was through Smith's circle of acquaintances Hitler was first introduced to Ernst Franz Sedgwick Hanfstaengl (Putzie), a graduate of Harvard University who played an important role in the formation of A. Hitler as a politician, rendered him significant financial support, and secured him the acquaintance and communication with senior British figures.
Hitler was prepared in politics, however, while Germany reigned in prosperity, his party remained on the periphery of public life. The situation changed dramatically with the beginning of the crisis.
Since the autumn of 1929 after the collapse of the American stock exchange was triggered by the Federal Reserve, the third stage of the strategy of Anglo-American financial circles started.
The Federal Reserve and JP Morgan decided to stop lending to Germany, inspired by the banking crisis and economic depression in Central Europe.
In September 1931, England abandoned the gold standard, deliberately destroying the international system of payments and completely cutting off the financial oxygen to the Weimar Republic.
But a financial miracle occurred with the Nazi party: in September 1930, as a result of large donations from Thyssen, "I.G. Farben", Kirdorf's party got 6.4 million votes, and took second place in the Reichstag, after which generous investments from abroad were activated.
The main link between the major German industrialists and foreign financiers became H. Schacht.
On January 4th, 1932, a meeting was held between the largest English financier M. Norman, A. Hitler, and von Papen, which concluded a secret agreement on the financing of the NSDAP.
This meeting was also attended by US policymakers and the Dulles brothers, something which their biographers do not like to mention.
On January 14th, 1933, a meeting between Hitler, Schroder, Papen and Kepler took place, where Hitler's program was fully approved.
It was here that they finally resolved the issue of the transfer of power to the Nazis, and on 30th January Hitler became Chancellor. The implementation of the fourth stage of the strategy thus begun.
The attitude of the Anglo-American ruling circles to the new government was very sympathetic. When Hitler refused to pay reparations, which, naturally, called into question the payment of war debts, neither Britain nor France showed him the claims of the payments.
Moreover, after the visit in the United States in May 1933, H. Schacht was placed again as the head of Reichsbank, and after his meeting with the President and the biggest bankers on Wall Street, America allocated Germany new loans totaling $1 billion.
In June, during a trip to London and a meeting with M. Norman, Schacht also sought an English loan of $2 billion, and a reduction and then cessation of payments on old loans. Thus, the Nazis got what they could not achieve with the previous government.
In the summer of 1934, Britain signed the Anglo-German transfer agreement, which became one of the foundations of British policy towards the Third Reich, and at the end of the 30's, Germany became the main trading partner of England.
Schroeder Bank became the main agent of Germany in the UK, and in 1936 his office in New York teamed up with the Rockefellers to create the "Schroeder, Rockefeller & Co." investment Bank, which "Times" magazine called the "economic propagandist axis of Berlin-Rome".
As Hitler himself admitted, he conceived his four-year plan on the basis of foreign financial loans, so it never inspired him with the slightest alarm.
In August 1934, American "Standard oil" in Germany acquired 730,000 acres of land and built large oil refineries that supplied the Nazis with oil.
At the same time, Germany secretly took delivery of the most modern equipment for aircraft factories from the United States, which would begin the production of German planes.
Germany received a large number of military patents from American firms Pratt and Whitney, "Douglas", "Curtis Wright", and American technology was building the "Junkers-87".
In 1941, when the Second world war was raging, American investments in the economy of Germany amounted to $475 million. "Standard oil" invested - 120 million, "General motors" - $35 million, ITT — $30 million, and "Ford" — $17.5 million.
The close financial and economic cooperation of Anglo-American and Nazi business circles was the background against which, in the 30's, a policy of appeasement led to world war II.
Today, when the world's financial elite began to implement the "Great depression — 2" plan, with the subsequent transition to the "new world order", identifying its key role in the organization of crimes against humanity becomes a priority.
Translated by Ollie Richardson, from ru-polit.livejournal / Yuri Rubtsov is a doctor of historical sciences, academician of the Academy of military sciences, and member of the International Association of historians of world war II.
Meet the Man Who Predicted the Future in 1992, Dr. John Coleman
Dr. John Coleman, being a historian in intelligence community, researched in full scope the sinister forces behind the New world order movement. This video lecture represents a culmination of his findings about secret societies which form this global movement and how it came into existence.
Wake up America! - Dr. John Coleman (Illuminati, Committee of 300)
John Coleman Ultimate Collection
John Coleman Ultimate Collection
If you look closely at this list of the Committee of 300 members you will notice many of them are the elite and royal families of Europe. This organization has Gentile and Jewish membership.
The Committee of 300: Some of the Shadow "Elite" - Complete List
The Committee of 300 governs the world via a three-city state empire, in which the cities pay no taxes and obey their own laws.
City of London Corporation – Financial power center, established in 106;
District of Columbia – Military power center, established in 1871;
Vatican City – Religious power center, sovereign in 1929 ;
The Committee of 300 uses a network of roundtable groups, think tanks and secret societies which control the world’s largest financial institutions and governments. The most prominent of these groups include Chatham House, Bilderburg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Ditchley Foundation, Club of Rome, RAND Corporation, PNAC and of course Freemasonry.
Western Europe, excluding the German Empire, was united by the House of Guelph in 1815. The German Empire was conquered in 1918 along with the Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire following World War I. The thousand year war between the Guelph’s and Ghibelline’s finally concluded with the Axis defeat in WWII, and the introduction of nuclear weapons, since then the world has been under monopolist control.
The victors of WWII play off the Germanic race as losers in that ideologically staged war.
The Germanic race was in fact spectacular winners, crushing the mighty Japanese Empire and recapturing control over the Holy Land. Communism was allowed to spread through Eastern Europe and Asia, proving to be a superior method of conquering peoples than warfare.
Communism in the forms of socialism, Outcome Based Education and slanted mass media has spread through the western world converting people by suggestion to Marxist-Leninist ideology.
Following WWII in 1946 the Tavistock Institute was established in London with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioural science along Freudian lines of ‘controlling’ humans established it as the world centre of foundation ideology.
“All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal—to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honour, patriotism and sexual behaviour, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control.”
This section then goes into a whole spiel about World War III, which the Galactics have told us will not happen.
But another section of the site lists what Ben Fulford says he believes is the most accurate listing of the Committee of 300.
Some names I know. Some I don’t. You may.
But there are enough well known faces from world politics – past and present, royalty, the church and financial families for me to relate to.
And so, for posterity’s sake, here they are.
Current Membership List of The Committee of 300:
Abdullah II, King of Jordan
Abramovich, Roman
Ackermann, Josef
Adeane, Edward
Agius, Marcus
Ahtisaari, Martti
Akerson, Daniel
Albert II, King of Belgium
Alexander, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia
Amato, Giuliano
Anderson, Carl A.
Andreotti, Giulio
Andrew, Duke of York
Anne, Princess Royal
Anstee, Nick
Ash, Timothy Garton
Astor, William Waldorf
Aven, Pyotr
Balkenende, Jan Peter
Ballmer, Steve
Balls, Ed
Barroso, José Manuel
Beatrix, Queen of the Netherlands
Belka, Marek
Bergsten, C. Fred
Berlusconi, Silvio
Bernake, Ben
Bernstein, Nils
Berwick, Donald
Bildt, Carl
Bischoff, Sir Winfried
Blair, Tony
Blankfein, Lloyd
Blavatnik, Leonard
Bloomberg, Michael
Bolkestein, Frits
Bolkiah, Hassanal
Bonello, Michael C
Bonino, Emma
Boren, David L.
Borwin, Duke of Mecklenburg
Bronfman, Charles
Bronfman, Edgar Jr.
Bruton, John
Brzezinski, Zbigniew
Budenberg, Robin
Buffet, Warren
Bush, George HW
Cameron, David
Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique
Carington, Peter
Carl XVI Gustaf, King of Sweden
Carlos, Duke of Parma
Carney, Mark
Carroll, Cynthia
Caruana, Jaime
Castell, Sir William
Chan, Anson
Chan, Margaret
Chan, Norman
Charles, Prince of Wales
Chartres, Richard
Chiaie, Stefano Delle
Chipman, Dr John
Chodiev, Patokh
Christoph, Prince of Schleswig-Holstein
Cicchitto, Fabrizio
Clark, Wesley
Clarke, Kenneth
Clegg, Nick
Clinton, Bill
Cohen, Abby Joseph
Cohen, Ronald
Cohn, Gary
Colonna di Paliano, Marcantonio, Duke of Paliano
Constantijn, Prince of the Netherlands
Constantine II, King of Greece
Cooksey, David
Cowen, Brian
Craven, Sir John
Crockett, Andrew
Dadush, Uri
D’Aloisio, Tony
Darling, Alistair
Davies, Sir Howard
Davignon, Étienne
Davis, David
de Rothschild, Benjamin
de Rothschild, David René
de Rothschild, Evelyn
de Rothschild, Leopold
Deiss, Joseph
Deripaska, Oleg
Dobson, Michael
Draghi, Mario
Du Plessis, Jan
Dudley, William C.
Duisenberg, Wim
Edward, Duke of Kent
Edward, Earl of Wessex
Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom
Elkann, John
Emanuele, Vittorio, Prince of Naples
Ernst August, Prince of Hanover
Feldstein, Martin
Festing, Matthew
Fillon, François
Fischer, Heinz
Fischer, Joschka
Fischer, Stanley
FitzGerald, Niall
Franz, Duke of Bavaria
Fridman, Mikhail
Friso, Prince of Orange-Nassau
Gates, Bill
Geidt, Christopher
Geithner, Timothy
Georg Friedrich, Prince of Prussia
Gibson-Smith, Dr Chris
Gorbachev, Mikhail
Gore, Al
Gotlieb, Allan
Green, Stephen
Greenspan, Alan
Grosvenor, Gerald, 6th Duke of Westminster
Gurría, José Ángel
Hague, William
Hampton, Sir Philip
Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein
Harald V, King of Norway
Harper, Stephen
Heisbourg, François
Henri, Grand Duke of Luxembourg
Hildebrand, Philipp
Hills, Carla Anderson
Holbrooke, Richard
Honohan, Patrick
Howard, Alan
Ibragimov, Alijan
Ingves, Stefan
Isaacson, Walter
Juan Carlos, King of Spain
Jacobs, Kenneth M.
Julius, DeAnne
Juncker, Jean-Claude
Kenen, Peter
Kerry, John
King, Mervyn
Kinnock, Glenys
Kissinger, Henry
Knight, Malcolm
Koon, William H. II
Krugman, Paul
Kufuor, John
Lajolo, Giovanni
Lake, Anthony
Lambert, Richard
Lamy, Pascal
Landau, Jean-Pierre
Laurence, Timothy
Leigh-Pemberton, James
Leka, Crown Prince of Albania
Leonard, Mark
Levene, Peter
Leviev, Lev
Levitt, Arthur
Levy, Michael
Lieberman, Joe
Livingston, Ian
Loong, Lee Hsien
Lorenz of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este
Louis Alphonse, Duke of Anjou
Louis-Dreyfus, Gérard
Mabel, Princess of Orange-Nassau
Mandelson, Peter
Manning, Sir David
Margherita, Archduchess of Austria-Este
Margrethe II, Queen of Denmark
Martínez, Guillermo Ortiz
Mashkevitch, Alexander
Massimo, Stefano, Prince of Roccasecca dei Volsci
Massimo-Brancaccio, Fabrizio Prince of Arsoli and Triggiano
McDonough, William Joseph
McLarty, Mack
Mersch, Yves
Michael, Prince of Kent
Michael, King of Romania
Miliband, David
Miliband, Ed
Mittal, Lakshmi
Moreno, Glen
Moritz, Prince and Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel
Murdoch, Rupert
Napoléon, Charles
Nasser, Jacques
Niblett, Robin
Nichols, Vincent
Nicolás, Adolfo
Noyer, Christian
Ofer, Sammy
Ogilvy, Alexandra, Lady Ogilvy
Ogilvy, David, 13th Earl of Airlie
Ollila, Jorma
Oppenheimer, Nicky
Osborne, George
Oudea, Frederic
Parker, Sir John
Patten, Chris
Pébereau, Michel
Penny, Gareth
Peres, Shimon
Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
Pio, Dom Duarte, Duke of Braganza
Pöhl, Karl Otto
Powell, Colin
Prokhorov, Mikhail
Quaden, Guy
Rasmussen, Anders Fogh
Ratzinger, Joseph Alois (Pope Benedict XVI)
Reuben, David
Reuben, Simon
Rhodes, William R.
Rice, Susan
Richard, Duke of Gloucester
Rifkind, Sir Malcolm
Ritblat, Sir John
Roach, Stephen S.
Robinson, Mary
Rockefeller, David Jr.
Rockefeller, David Sr.
Rockefeller, Nicholas
Rodríguez, Javier Echevarría
Rogoff, Kenneth
Roth, Jean-Pierre
Rothschild, Jacob
Rubenstein, David
Rubin, Robert
Ruspoli, Francesco, 10th Prince of Cerveteri
Safra, Joseph
Safra, Moises
Sands, Peter
Sarkozy, Nicolas
Sassoon, Isaac
Sassoon, James
Sawers, Sir Robert John
Scardino, Marjorie
Schwab, Klaus
Schwarzenberg, Karel
Schwarzman, Stephen A.
Shapiro, Sidney
Sheinwald, Nigel
Sigismund, Grand Duke of Tuscany, Archduke of Austria
Simeon of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Snowe, Olympia
Sofía, Queen of Spain
Soros, George
Specter, Arlen
Stern, Ernest
Stevenson, Dennis
Steyer, Tom
Stiglitz, Joseph
Strauss-Kahn, Dominique
Straw, Jack
Sutherland, Peter
Tanner, Mary
Tedeschi, Ettore Gotti
Thompson, Mark
Thomson, Dr. James
Tietmeyer, Hans
Trichet, Jean-Claude
Tucker, Paul
Van Rompuy, Herman
Vélez, Álvaro Uribe
Verplaetse, Alfons
Villiger, Kaspar
Vladimirovna, Maria, Grand Duchess of Russia
Volcker, Paul
von Habsburg, Otto
Waddaulah, Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin, Sultan of Brunei
Walker, Sir David
Wallenberg, Jacob
Walsh, John
Warburg, Max
Weber, Axel Alfred
Weill, Michael David
Wellink, Nout
Whitman, Marina von Neumann
Willem-Alexander, Prince of Orange
William Prince of Wales
Williams, Dr Rowan
Williams, Shirley
Wilson, David
Wolfensohn, James
Wolin, Neal S.
Woolf, Harry
Woolsey, R. James Jr.
Worcester, Sir Robert
Wu, Sarah
Zoellick, Robert
"Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves." --Walter Rathenau, 1909, founder of the mammoth German General Electric Corporation
The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East India Company's Council of 300. The East India Company was chartered by the British royal family in 1600. It made vast fortunes in the opium drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its time. Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create a "New World Order", under a "Totalitarian Global Government".
There is no need to use "they" or "the enemy" except as shorthand. We know who "they", the enemy, is. The Committee of 300 with its "aristocracy", its ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks, presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators-this is the enemy.
Secret societies exist by deception.
Each is a hierarchy with an inner circle at the top, who deceives those below with lies, such as claiming a noble agenda; thus, duping them into following a web of compartmentalized complicity. The inner circle of the Committee of 300 is the Order of the Garter, headed by Queen Elizabeth Windsor II. It is interesting to note that the Windsor's changed their name from the Germanic Saxe-Coburg-Gotha during WWI, because of anti-German sentiment.
The enemy is clearly identifiable as the Committee of 300 and its front organizations, such as the Royal Institute for International Affairs (Chatham House), the Club of Rome, NATO, U.N., the Black Nobility, the Tavistock Institute, CFR and all its affiliated organizations, the think tanks and research institutions controlled by Stanford and the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations and last, but certainly not least, the military establishment.
The Committee of 300 is the ultimate secret society made up of an untouchable ruling class, which includes the Queen of the United Kingdom (Elizabeth II), the Queen of the Netherlands, the Queen of Denmark and the royal families of Europe.
These aristocrats decided at the death of Queen Victoria, the matriarch of the Venetian Black Guelphs that, in order to gain world-wide control, it would be necessary for its aristocratic members to "go into business" with the non-aristocratic but extremely powerful leaders of corporate business on a global scale, and so the doors to ultimate power were opened to what the Queen of England likes to refer to as "the commoners".
Through their illicit banking cartel, they own the stock of the Federal Reserve, which is a private for profit corporation that violates U.S. Constitution and is a root of the problem. The decadent American families of the unholy partnership, thoroughly corrupted and wallowing in tainted opium money, went on to become what we know today as the Eastern Liberal Establishment.
Its members, under the careful guidance and direction of the British Crown, and subsequently, its foreign policy executive arm, the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), now known as Chatham House, located in England (across St. James's Square from the Astors), ran the United States from top to bottom through their secret upper-level, parallel government, which is tightly meshed with the Committee of 300, the ultimate secret society. That secret, all-powerful government is now more in control of the United States than ever before.
In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled "new" society only it isn't new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus. It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H. G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: "The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution".
Most of the Committee of 300's immense wealth arose out of the opium trade with China and India. Obscene profits went straight into the royal coffers, and into the pockets of the nobility, the oligarchs and plutocrats, and made them billionaires.
The ordinary people of China, India, and England profited nothing from "opium revenues". In the same way the people of South Africa, black and white, never profited from the gold mining industry, whose revenues were piped directly into the City of London banks and Merchant banks.
The Committee of 300 is responsible for the phony drug wars here in the U.S. These phony drug wars were to get us to give away our constitutional rights. Asset forfeiture is a prime example, where huge assets can be seized without trail and no proof of guilt needed. Also the Committee of 300 long ago decreed that there shall be a smaller-much smaller-and better world, that is, their idea of what constitutes a better world.
The myriads of useless eaters consuming scarce natural resources were to be culled by up to 99%. Industrial progress supports population growth. Therefore the command to multiply and subdue the earth found in Genesis had to be subverted.
This called for an attack upon Christianity; the slow but sure disintegration of industrial nation states; the destruction of billions of people, referred to by the Committee of 300 as "surplus population," and the removal of any leader who dared to stand in the way of the Committee's global planning to reach the foregoing objectives.
Not that the U.S. government didn't know, but as it was part of the conspiracy, it helped to keep the lid on information rather than let the truth be known. Queen, Elizabeth II, is the head of the Committee of 300. The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become its "welfare" recipients of the future.
The current criminal agenda of the Committee of 300 is further evidenced by recently leaked Club of Rome documents, as they describe how they will use drugs to help stifle resistance to their New World Order scheme: "… having been failed by Christianity, and with unemployment rife on every hand, those who have been without jobs for five years or more, will turn away from the church and seek solace in drugs.
By then, full control of the drug trade must be completed in order that the government of all countries who are under our jurisdiction have a monopoly in place which we will control by controlling supplies reaching the market… Drug bars will take care of the unruly and the discontented. Would-be revolutionaries will be turned into harmless addicts with no will of their own…"The crowned cobras of Europe and their Eastern Liberal Establishment families will not tolerate any true war against drugs.
The war on drugs, which the Bush administration was allegedly fighting, was for the legalization of all types and classes of drugs. Such drugs are not solely a social aberration, but a full-scale attempt to gain control of the minds of the people of the United States.
At present, this is the principal task of the Committee of 300. Nothing has changed in the opium-heroin-cocaine trade. It is still in the hands of the same "upper class" families in Britain and the United States. It is still a fabulously profitable trade where what appear to be big losses through sometimes seizures of drug shipments are actually small interlopers trying to break into the preserves of the drug trade hierarchy, who sit in paneled board rooms in New York, Hong Kong and London over port and cigars and congratulate another success in the eradication of "competitors."
Included in the Committee of 300 membership are the old families of the European Black Nobility, the American Eastern Liberal Establishment (in Freemason hierarchy and the Order of Skull and Bone), the Illuminati, or as it is known by the Committee "MORIAH CONQUERING WIND," the Mumma Group, The National and World Council of Churches, the Circle of Initiates, the Nine Unknown Men, Lucis Trust, Jesuit Liberation Theologists, The Order of the Elders of Zion, the Nasi Princes, International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the United Nations (U.N.), the Central, British Quator Coronati, Italian P2 Masonry-especially those in the Vatican hierarchy-the Central Intelligence Agency, Tavistock Institute selected personnel, various members of leading foundations and insurance companies, the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, the Milner Group-Round Table, Cini Foundation, German Marshall Fund, Ditchley Foundation, NATO, Club of Rome, Environmentalists, The Order of St. John of Jerusalem, One World Government Church, Socialist International, Black Order, Thule Society, Anenherbe-Rosicrucianists, The Great Superior Ones and literally HUNDREDS of other organizations.
In the case of John F. Kennedy, the assassination was carried out with great attendant publicity and with the utmost brutality to serve as a warning to world leaders not to get out of line. Pope John Paul I was quietly murdered because he was getting close to the Committee of 300 through Freemasons in the Vatican hierarchy. His successor, Pope John Paul II, was publicly humiliated as a warning to cease and desist-which he has done. As we shall see, certain Vatican leaders are today seated on the Committee of 300.
The Committee of 300 appears to base much of its important decisions affecting mankind on the philosophy of Polish aristocrat, Felix Dzerzinski, who regarded mankind as being slightly above the level of cattle. As a close friend of British intelligence agent Sydney Reilly (Reilly was actually Dzerzinski's controller during the Bolshevik Revolution's formative years), he often confided in Reilly during his drinking bouts.
Dzerzinski was, of course, the beast who ran the Red Terror apparatus. He once told Reilly, while the two were on a drinking binge, that "Man is of no importance. Look at what happens when you starve him. He begins to eat his dead companions to stay alive. Man is only interested in his own survival. That is all that counts. All the Spinoza stuff is a lot of rubbish."
The roots of the East India Company (chartered by Queen Elizabeth I on December 31, 1600 and dissolved in 1873) sprout from the European Black Nobility. The Black Nobility are the oligarchic families of Venice and Genoa, who in the 12th century held the privileged trading rights (monopolies). The first of three crusades, from 1063 to 1123, established the power of the Venetian Black Nobility and solidified the power of the wealthy ruling class.
The Black Nobility aristocracy achieved complete control over Venice in 1171, when the appointment of the doge was transferred to what was known as the Great Council, which consisted of members of the commercial aristocracy, a complete triumph for them.
Venice has remained in their hands ever since, but the power and influence of the Venetian Black Nobility extends far beyond its borders, and today, is felt in every corner of the globe. In 1204 the oligarchic family parceled out feudal enclaves to their members, and from this epoch dates the great building-up of power and pressure until the government became a closed corporation of the leading Black Nobility families.
It is important to note that the European Black Nobility is responsible for the insidious entanglements of numerous secret societies, lodges, and organizations, which are backed with high finance and powerful political connections.
Such organizations include: Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group (German version of CFR), Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), United Nations (founded by CFR), Illuminati order Skull & Bones (inner circle of the CFR), International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, Bank of International Settlement, Club of Rome, Chatham House (formally the Royal Institute of International Affairs - RIIA), Round Table, Tavistock Institute for Human Studies (England's psychological warfare think tank), Associated Press, Reuters (Rothschild owned news monopoly used for brainwashing the masses), and many others, all of which, whether they are dupes or adapts, work in favor of Great Britain's aristocracy and their one world government agenda.
Although there is a wide cross-section, all roads lead to the Queen of England. The technique for keeping their illicit scheme secret is compartmentalization. Only the people in the inner circle, who are part of the capstone at the top of the pyramid, know the entire extent of the fraud. Adepts are few and dupes many.
Typically, the dupes are told lies that their involvement is benevolent; thus, they become unwitting accomplices in crime. This is why it is imperative to expose this diabolical ring of power. Illicit secret societies cannot withstand the light of day. Once exposed, the cabal and their minions will fall like a house of cards.
The European Black Nobility earned its title through dirty tricks, so when the population revolted against the monopolies in government, as anywhere else, the leaders of the uprising were quickly seized and brutally hanged. They use secret assassinations, murder, the bankrupting of opposing citizens or companies, kidnapping and rape.
All the families listed are connected with the House of Guelph, one of the original Black Nobility families of Venice from which the House of Windsor and thus the present Queen of the United Kingdom, Elizabeth II, descends.
What are the goals of the secret elite group, the inheritors of Illuminism (Moriah Conquering Wind), the Cult of Dionysius, the Cult of Isis, Catharism, Bogomilism? This elite group that also calls itself the OLYMPIANS (they truly believe they are equal in power and stature to the legendary gods of Olympus, who have, like Lucifer their god, set themselves above our true God) absolutely believe they have been charged with implementing the following by divine right:
1. A One World Government-New World Order with a unified church and monetary system under their direction. Not many people are aware that the One World Government began setting up its "church" in the 1920's/ 1930's, for they realized the need for a religious belief inherent in mankind to have an outlet and, therefore, set up a "church" body to channel that belief in the direction they desired.
2. The utter destruction of all national identity and national pride.
3. The destruction of religion and more especially the Christian religion, with the one exception, their own creation mentioned above.
4. Control of each and every person through means of mind control and what Brzezinski call "technotronics" which would create human-like robots and a system of terror beside which Felix Dzerzinski's Red Terror will look like children at play.
5. An end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power in what they call "the post-industrial zero-growth society."
Exempted are the computer and service industries. United States industries that remain will be exported to countries such as Mexico where abundant slave labour is available.
Unemployables in the wake of industrial destruction will either become opium-heroin and or cocaine addicts, or become statistics in the elimination process we know today as Global 2000.
6. Legalization of drugs and pornography.
7. Depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried out by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. It is interesting to note that Pol Pot's genocidal plans were drawn up here in the United States by one of the Club of Rome's research foundations. It is also interesting that the Committee is presently seeking to reinstate the Pol Pot butchers in Cambodia.
8. Suppression of all scientific development except for those deemed beneficial by the Committee. Especially targeted is nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion experiments presently being scorned and ridiculed by the Committee and its jackals of the press.
Development of the fusion torch would blow the Committee's conception of "limited natural resources" right out of the window. A fusion torch properly used could create unlimited untapped natural resources from the most ordinary substances. Fusion torch uses are legion and would benefit mankind in a manner which is as yet not even remotely comprehended by the public.
9. Cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, and by means of starvation and diseases in Third World countries, the death of 3 billion people by the year 2000, people they call "useless eaters." The Committee of 300 commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a paper on this subject of how best to bring about such genocide.
The paper was produced under the title the "Global 2000 Report" and was accepted and approved for action by President Carter, for and on behalf of the U.S. Government, and accepted by Edwin Muskie, then Secretary of State. Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the population of the United States is to be reduced by 100 million by the year 2050.
10. To weaken the moral fibre of the nation and to demoralize workers in the labour class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced by the Club of Rome, demoralized and discouraged workers will resort to alcohol and drugs.
The youth of the land will be encouraged by means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this regard The Committee of 300 commissioned Tavistock Institute to prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as "The Aquarian Conspiracy."
11. To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then "managing" such crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the United States, an agency for crisis management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first disclosed in 1980.
12. To introduce new cults and continue to boost those already functioning which includes rock "music" gangsters such as the filthy, degenerate Mick Jagger's "Rolling Stones" (a gangster group much favoured by European Black Nobility) and all of the Tavistock created "rock" groups which began with "The Beatles."
To continue to build up the cult of Christian fundamentalism begun by the British East India Company's servant, Darby, which will be misused to strengthen the Zionist state of Israel through identifying with the Jews through the myth of "God's Chosen People" and by donating very substantial amounts of money to what they mistakenly believe is a religious cause in the furtherance of Christianity.
13. To press for the spread of religious cults such as the Moslem Brotherhood, Moslem fundamentalism, the Sikhs, and to carry out experiments of the Jim Jones and "Son of Sam" type of murders. It is worth noting that the late Ayatollah Khomeini was a creation of British Intelligence Military Intelligence Division 6, commonly known as M16, as I reported in my 1985 work, "What Really Happened in Iran."
14. To export "religious liberation" ideas around the world so as to undermine all existing religions but more especially the Christian religion. This began with "Jesuit Liberation Theology" which brought about the downfall of the Somoza family rule in Nicaragua and which is today destroying EI Salvador, now 25 years into a "civil war," Costa Rica and Honduras.
One very active entity engaged in so-called liberation theology is the Communist oriented Mary Knoll Mission. This accounts for the extensive media attention to the murder of four of Mary Knoll's so-called nuns in EI Salvador a few years ago.
The four nuns were Communist subversive agents and their activities were widely documented by the government of EI Salvador. The United States press and news media refused to give any space or coverage to the mass of documentation in possession of the Salvadorian government, documentation which proves what the Mary Knoll Mission nuns were doing in the country. Mary Knoll is in service in many countries, and played a leading role in bringing Communism to Rhodesia, Mozambique, Angola and South Africa.
15. To cause a total collapse of the world's economies and engender total political chaos.
16. To take control of all Foreign and domestic policies of the United States.
17. To give the fullest support to supranational institutions such as the United Nations (UN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the World Court and, as far as possible, make local institutions of lesser effect by gradually phasing them out or bringing them under the mantle of the United Nations.
18. Penetrate and subvert all governments, and work from within them to destroy the sovereign integrity of nations represented by them.
19. Organize a world-wide terrorist apparatus and negotiate with terrorists whenever terrorist activities take place. It will be recalled that it was Bettino Craxi who persuaded the Italian and U.S. governments to negotiate with the Red Brigades kidnapers of Prime Minister Moro and General Dozier.
As an aside, General Dozier is under orders not to talk about what happened to him. Should he break that silence, he will no doubt be made "a horrible example of" in the manner in which Kissinger dealt with Aldo Moro, Ali Bhutto and General Zia ul Haq.
20. Take control of education in America with the intent and purpose of utterly and completely destroying it.
Much of these goals, which I first enumerated in 1969, have since been achieved or are well on their way to being achieved. Of special interest in the Committee of 300 program is the core of their economic policy, which is largely based on the teachings of Malthus, the son of an English country parson who was pushed to prominence by the British East India Company upon which the Committee of 300 is modelled.
Malthus maintained that man's progress is tied to the earth's natural ability to support a given number of people, beyond which point earth's limited resources would rapidly be depleted. Once these natural resources have been consumed, it will be impossible to replace them. Hence, Malthus observed, it is necessary to limit populations within the boundaries of decreasing natural resources.
It goes without saying that the elite will not allow themselves to be threatened by a burgeoning population of "useless eaters," hence culling must be practiced. As I have previously stated, "culling" is going on today, using the methods mandated in the "Global 2000 Report." -- Dr. John Coleman, former British Intelligence Officer, The Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300, http://www.coleman300.com
This committee of 300 is modeled after the British East India Company’s Council of 300, founded by the British aristocracy in 1727.
Most of its immense wealth arose out of the opium trade with China. This group is responsible for the phony drug wars here in the U.S. These phony drug wars were to get us to give away our constitutional rights.
Asset forfeiture is a prime example, where huge assets can be seized without trail and no proof of guilt needed. Also the Committee of 300 long ago decreed that there shall be a smaller-much smaller-and better world, that is, their idea of what constitutes a better world.
The myriads of useless eaters consuming scarce natural resources were to be culled. Industrial progress supports population growth. Therefore the command to multiply and subdue the earth found in Genesis had to be subverted.
This called for an attack upon Christianity; the slow but sure disintegration of industrial nation states; the destruction of hundreds of millions of people, referred to by the Committee of 300 as "surplus population," and the removal of any leader who dared to stand in the way of the Committee’s global planning to reach the foregoing objectives.
Not that the U.S. government didn’t know, but as it was part of the conspiracy, it helped to keep the lid on information rather than let the truth be known. Queen, Elizabeth II, is the head of the Committee of 300.
The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become its "welfare" recipients of the future.
The committee appears to base much of its important decisions affecting mankind on the philosophy of Polish aristocrat, Felix Dzerzinski, who regarded mankind as being slightly above the level of cattle.
As a close friend of British intelligence agent Sydney Reilly (Reilly was actually Dzerzinski’s controller during the Bolshevik Revolution’s formative years), he often confided in Reilly during his drinking bouts.
Dzerzinski was, of course, the beast who ran the Red Terror apparatus.
He once told Reilly, while the two were on a drinking binge, that,
"Man is of no importance. Look at what happens when you starve him. He begins to eat his dead companions to stay alive. Man is only interested in his own survival. That is all that counts. All the Spinoza stuff is a lot of rubbish."
Sources: HumansAreFree.com; PseudoReality; BibliotecaPleyades;
Coveners League has many articles, here is a small sample, please check them out.
Teach White Europeans About Their Ice Age Heritage
White European Racial Pride. What Race Are You ?
White History, Music, Wars, Dances and Film Archives
Whites Fight Back Against Racism & Bigotry
European Birth Rate Statistics. Update 2
The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan - To Genocide Indigenous Europeans in Europe
Europe & Middle Eastern Wildlife. Update 2
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
Media Ownership: The Illusion of Choice
White Gentile Organizations & Jewish Community Based Organizations
Citizens Initizens Referendums ( CIR ) in Switzerland
Music from BOLÉRO (by Maurice Ravel) combined with a scene of Cleopatra arriving to Rome from the movie CLEOPATRA (1963, dir. Joseph L. Mankiewicz, (C) Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation)
What did Cleopatra Look Like? Facial Reconstructions Revealed, with History.
I'm an artist that uses photoshop to bring old images and statues into the modern day. Let’s talk about Cleopatra, one of the most enigmatic figures of ancient history. She was the first Ptolemaic ruler of Egypt to even speak the Egyptian language, and she routinely outwitted her foes. She seduced two powerful Romans. But what did she look like? What did she do? What ethnicity was Cleopatra? Let’s talk the history & appearance of Cleopatra, now.
Women have been coloring their hair with henna for thousands of years, so Cleopatra could have colored her brunette locks red on occasions. I agree with many other viewers that her redheaded depictions are stunning.
CLEOPATRA: THE EXHIBITION - CLOSED
The most famous woman(Cleopatra) in Egyptian History, was actually descended from A GREEK DYNASTY, The Ptolemies ..." 00:58 - "...The First Ptolemy was the one of the Generals of Alexander the Great took power three hundred years before Cleopatra was born…" 01:06 - "... She encouraged scholarship and learning, wrote books and was the first Ptolemy of Pharaoh to speak Egyptian as well as GREEK ..." 01:27
Liz Taylor and Richard Burton Filmset Cleopatra 1961
Taken from Stormfront, Cleopatra was white
10 Strange Facts About Cleopatra Teachers Never Told You
ΚΛΕΟΠΑΤΡΑ= Ptolemeos dynasty = Ptolemeos= friend and one of Alexander the great officials= MAΚΕΔΝΟΙ / ΜΑCEDONIANS= DORIC TRIBE = one of the many arcaic Hellenic/ Greek tribes = EΛΛΗΝΕΣ και Ελληνίδα βασίλισσα της Αιγύπτου = Greek Queen of Egypt ?????????????????????
Discover the true Cleopatra: A 90 minute documentary With Zahi Hawass, Kathleen Martinez and more...A Documentary by Curtis Ryan Woodside, Co-Produced by Sofia Aziz. Discover the REAL Cleopatra...A figure whose name and legacy is burned into the minds of billions. Coming from a tenacious Greek Macedonian family, she had to fight and even kill for her place on the throne, a noble attempt to save a failing Egypt. She left her mark during the final days of ancient egypt. Her story has been warped so much through out history, from biast opinions to praise, yet who was she really? Everyone thinks they know her, everyone has a different opinion, but most of those are modern, based on films and misinformed play-writes. How much do we really know about the true… Cleopatra.
"These members of the upper classes (and not all were traitors) were sponsored from the beginning by the West. The West considered that once its values of parliamentary democracy, republicanism or constitutional monarchy were introduced into Russia, it would become just another bourgeois Western country."
| Share to Facebook |
Share to TwitterShare to RedditShare to VkontakteShare to MessengerShare to TelegramShare to WhatsAppShare to Email
This post first appeared on Russia Insider
This article originally appeared on a new site about the Christian renaissance in Russia, called Russian Faith.
Father Andrew Phillips, is a long-serving priest in the ROCOR Orthodox church in Essex, UK. Biography. He is a prolific writer, particularly on Russian history and current events, from an Orthodox Christian perspective.
In this January 2013 article, he answers readers’ questions about the last Russian Tsar, Nicholas II, debunking decades of deliberate, slanderous lies coming from the media, academia, and governments of the UK, Germany, and America, but mostly from the UK.
For another excellent article debunking this anti-Russian propaganda which is so ingrained in the West, see his fascinating article about Rasputin, whom he sees as a hero, also maliciously slandered by Russia's enemies.
Q: Why are most academics so negative about Tsar Nicholas II?
A: Western academics, like Soviet academics, are negative about him because they are secularists. For example, I recently read the book ‘Crimea’ by the British historian of Russia, Orlando Figes. This is an interesting book on the Crimean War, with many well-researched details and facts, written as senior academics should write.
However, the author starts out from unspoken, purely Western secularist criteria, that since the Tsar of the age, Nicholas I, was not a Western secularist, he must have been a religious fanatic, and that his intention was to conquer the Ottoman Empire. Through his love of detail, Figes overlooks the main point – what the Crimean War was actually about from the Russian side. All he can see is Western-style imperialist aims, which he then attributes to Russia. This attribution is a projection of his Western self.
What Figes misunderstands is that the parts of the Ottoman Empire which Nicholas I was interested in were those where an Orthodox Christian population had for centuries suffered under the Muslim Yoke. The Crimean War was not a colonial, imperialist Russian war to expand into the Ottoman Empire and exploit it, like those conducted by Western Powers to expand into Africa and Asia and exploit them. It was a struggle to liberate from oppression – in fact an anti-colonial, anti-imperialist war. The aim was to free Orthodox lands and peoples from oppression, not to conquer someone else’s empire.
As for Nicholas I being a religious fanatic, in the eyes of secularists all sincere Christians must be ‘religious fanatics’. This is because secularists do not have a spiritual dimension. They are always one-dimensional, unable to see beyond their own secular cultural conditioning, to think ‘outside the box’.
Russian Imperial Family 1911Q: Is this secular outlook why Western historians charge Tsar Nicholas II with being weak and unfitted?
A: Yes. This is Western political propaganda, invented at the time and still parroted today. Western historians are educated and paid by Western Establishments and cannot see outside that box.
Serious post-Soviet historians have disproved these charges, invented by the Western and the Westernised, gladly repeated by Soviet Communists, as their justification for the dismantlement of the Tsar’s Empire.
The only justification for the charge that the Tsarevich was ‘unfitted’ is the fact that he was at first unprepared to be Tsar because his father, Alexander III, died suddenly and at a young age. But he soon learned and became ‘fitted’.
Another favourite false accusation is that the Tsar started wars, namely the Japano-Russian War, called the Russo-Japanese War, and the Kaiser’s War, called the First World War. This is untrue. He was the only world leader who wanted to disarm, he was anti-militaristic. As regards the war against Japanese aggression, the Japanese, financed, armed and encouraged by the USA and Britain, started the Japano-Russian War. It attacked the Russian Fleet without warning in Port Arthur – a name that almost rhymes with Pearl Harbour. And, as we know, it was the Austro-Hungarians, urged on by the Kaiser who was desperate for any excuse to start a War, who triggered the First World War.
Let us recall that it was Tsar Nicholas who for the first time in world history had urged disarmament at The Hague in 1899, because he could see that Western Europe was a powder keg, waiting to explode. He was a moral and spiritual leader, the only world leader then who did not have narrow, national interests at heart and was not re-arming at huge cost.
Instead, as the Anointed of God, he had at heart the universal interests of all Orthodox Christendom, to bring to Christ all God-created mankind. Why else make sacrifices for Serbia? To have survived, he must have been incredibly strong-willed, as, among others, the French President Émile Loubet remarked.
All the powers of hell unleashed against the Tsar would never have been unleashed to remove him if he had been weak. Only the strong have to be destroyed, as is confirmed by those who knew him at the time.
Q: You say that he was profoundly Orthodox, but it is true that he had very little Russian blood, isn’t it?
A: Forgive me, but that statement contains a racist presumption, that you have to have ‘Russian blood’ to be Orthodox, a universal Christian. The Tsar was, I believe, one 128th Russian by blood. And so what? The Tsar’s sister answered this very challenge very adequately over fifty years ago. Interviewed by the Greek journalist, Ian Vorres, in 1960, his sister, the Grand Duchess Olga explained: ‘Did the British call George VI a German? He had not a drop of English blood in him…Blood is not everything. It is the soil you spring from, the faith you are brought up in, the language you speak and think in’.
Q: There are some Russians today who describe Tsar Nicholas as a ‘Redeemer’. Do you believe that?
A: Certainly not! There is only one Redeemer, the Saviour Jesus Christ. What can however be argued is that his sacrifice, and therefore that of his Family, of his servants and of the tens of millions of others who were murdered by the Soviet and Fascist regimes that followed, was redemptive. Rus was crucified for the sins of the world. Indeed, the sufferings of Russian Orthodox have been redemptive in their blood and in their tears. However, it is true that all Christians are called on to redeem themselves through living in Christ THE Redeemer. Interestingly, the pious but not well-educated Russians who call the Tsar a ‘Redeemer’ also call Rasputin a saint.
RasputinQ: Speaking of this, what should we think of Rasputin?
A: Hundreds of books have been written about Rasputin – nearly all of them by people who never knew him. I would only repeat the words of the Tsar himself, ‘He is a simple, good, religious Russian’, and the words of the Tsar’s sister, Grand Duchess Olga, ‘He was neither saint nor devil…he was a peasant with a profound faith in God and a gift of healing’. The fact that Rasputin was later atrociously slandered, and finally in December 1916 tortured by Russian aristocrats – a sign of just how sick the upper class was – and assassinated by British spies, only helps him in eternity.
Q: But what about all the charges that he was a drunkard, a thief and a debauchee?
A: Soviet and Hollywood fiction writers, like the Soviet novelist Radzinsky, love this image of Rasputin. Contemporary historians inside deSovietising Russia have proved that virtually all, perhaps all, of these charges were slanders, fiction. Moreover, they were made up not to discredit Rasputin – he was only a pawn in the hands of the slanderers – but to discredit the Imperial Family.
Their logic was that if the Friend of the ruling family could be presented as a thief, drunkard and debauchee, therefore the Family must also be like that, and that therefore they were unworthy, and that they the slanderers should have power. Such slander was very simple and very primitive. People, decadent and without any spiritual depth, believed in it because they wanted to believe in it, because such always prefer slander, scandal and gossip to the Truth of Christ.
Tsar Nicholas II and Tsarevich Alexis of Russia in 1914Q: If we can come back to our main point, what is the relevance of Tsar Nicholas II today? Orthodox Christians are a small minority among all Christians. Even if he were important to all Orthodox, he would still be a minority interest among Christians.
A: Of course, we Christians are a minority. According to the statistics, of seven billion human beings on the planet, Christians number 2.2 billion – 32%. And Orthodox Christians are only 10% of all Christians, so only 3.2% of the world population, about one in thirty-three.
However, if we look at these statistics theologically, what do we see? For Orthodox Christians, all Non-Orthodox are lapsed Orthodox, who were brought involuntarily by their leaders, for all sorts of political reasons, worldly reasons of convenience, to become Non-Orthodox. For us, Catholics can be defined as Catholicised Orthodox and Protestants as Protestantised Catholics. We unworthy Orthodox are the leaven that leavens the lump.
Without the Church, there is no light and warmth of the Holy Spirit to radiate out into the rest of the world. Just as, even though you are outside the Sun, you can still feel the Sun’s light and warmth, so too the 90% of Christians who are outside the Church are still aware of the effects of the Church. For example, most of them confess the Holy Trinity and Christ as the Son of God. Why? Because of the Church which established such teachings long ago. Such is the grace of the Church that shines out of Her. Now, if we understand this, we will begin to understand the importance of the leader of Orthodox Christianity, the last successor of the Emperor Constantine, Tsar Nicholas II. His deposition changed the whole history of the Church, as also his Golgotha and his glorification today.
Q: If this is the case, why then was the Tsar deposed and then murdered?
A: Christians are always persecuted in the world, as our Lord told His disciples.
Pre-Revolutionary Russia ran on the Orthodox Faith. This was the oil that made the whole engine run. However, that Faith was rejected by the mass of the Westernised ruling elite, the aristocracy, and many others in the growing middle class. The Revolution was caused by a simple loss of faith, the engine ground to a halt and exploded for lack of oil.
Most of the Russian upper classes wanted power for themselves, in the same way that wealthy merchants and middle classes wanted power for themselves and so caused the French Revolution. Having obtained wealth, they wanted to mount the next rung in the hierarchy of values – the rung of power. In the Russian context this lust for power, which had come from the West, was therefore based by definition on a blind admiration of the West and a hatred of Russia. This we can see from the very beginning with figures like Kurbsky, Peter I, Catherine II and Westernisers like Chaadayev.
This lack of faith was also what poisoned the White Movement, which was disunited by its lack of a common and binding faith in Orthodox Tsardom. In general, Orthodox self-consciousness was absent in the Russian governing élite, which substituted various surrogates for it, whimsical mixtures of mysticism, occultism, freemasonry, socialism and a search for ‘truth’ in esoteric religions. Incidentally, these surrogates lived on in the Paris emigration, where various figures distinguished themselves in theosophy, anthroposophy, sophianism, name-worship and other very eccentric, but also spiritually dangerous fantasies.
These had so little love for Russia that they actually went into schism, breaking away from the Russian Church and justifying themselves for so doing! The poet Bekhteev wrote very sharply of this in his 1922 poem, ‘Come to your senses, upper classes!’, comparing the privileged situation in Paris to that of the people of crucified Rus in the homeland:
And once more their hearts are full of intrigue,
And once more treachery and lies are on their lips,
And life writes into the chapter of the last book
The vile treason of the grandees who knew it all.
These members of the upper classes (and not all were traitors) were sponsored from the beginning by the West. The West considered that once its values of parliamentary democracy, republicanism or constitutional monarchy were introduced into Russia, it would become just another bourgeois Western country. For the same reason, the Russian Church had to be Protestantised, that is spiritually neutralised, or rather neutered, as the West has tried to do with the Patriarchate of Constantinople and other Local Churches fallen under its power since 1917, as soon as Russian patronage was removed.
These attitudes were caused by the arrogant presumption that somehow the Western model could be universal. Incidentally, this is the arrogant presumption of the Western elites to this day, as they try to impose their model worldwide, presenting it as the ‘New World Order’.
The Tsar, the Lord’s Anointed representing the last bulwark of Church Christianity in the world, had to be removed, as he was blocking the power grab of the Western and Westernised world. However, in their incompetence, the aristocratic revolutionaries of February 1917 soon lost control of the situation and within a few months power had descended from them to the lowest of the low, to the criminal Bolsheviks. These set out on a course of massacre and genocide, of ‘red terror’ – just as in France five generations before, only now with far more murderous, twentieth-century, technology.
It was in this way that the motto of the Orthodox Empire was deformed. I remind you that it was ‘Orthodoxy, Sovereignty and People’. This was deformed by Westernised Russians and Western secularists, both then and now, into: ‘Obscurantism, Tyranny and Nationalism’.
Atheist Communists deformed it even further into ‘Centralised Communism, Totalitarian Dictatorship and National Bolshevism’. What did this motto in fact mean? It simply meant: ‘(Full-bodied, incarnate) Authentic Christianity, Spiritual Independence (from the powers of this world) and Love for God’s People. As I have said above, this motto is the spiritual, moral, political, economic and social programme of Orthodoxy.
Q: A social programme? But surely the Revolution came about because there were so many poor people and so much exploitation of the poor by the super-rich aristocrats, and the Tsar was at the head of that aristocracy?
A: No, it was precisely the aristocracy that was opposed to the Tsar and the people. The Tsar gave away much of his personal wealth and taxed the rich to the hilt under his brilliant Prime Minister Stolypin, who did so much for land reform. Sadly, the Tsar’s programme of social justice was one of the reasons why many aristocrats hated the Tsar. The Tsar and the people were one. They were both betrayed by the Westernised elite. This is clear from the assassination of Rasputin, which was the preparation for the Revolution. In it the peasants rightly saw the betrayal of the people by the upper classes.
Q: What was the role of the Jews in this?
A: There is an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that only Jews were – and are – responsible for everything bad in Russia (and everywhere else). This contradicts the words of Christ. First of all, the Jews who were involved in the Russian Revolution – and it is true that most of the Bolsheviks were Jews – were apostates, atheists, like Marx, and not real, practising Jews. However, those Jews who were involved worked hand in hand with Non-Jewish atheists, like the American banker Morgan, or with Russians and many others and depended on them.
Thus, we know full well that Britain organised the Revolution of February 1917, applauded by France and financed by the USA, that Lenin was transported to Russia by the Kaiser and financed by him, and that the masses who fought in the Red Army were Russian. None of these were Jews. Some people, captives of racist myths, simply refuse to see the truth – that the Revolution was Satanic and that Satan can use any nationality, any of us, for his poisonous works, Jews, Russians and Non-Russians. Satan favours no nationality, but makes use of any who surrender their free will to him for his ‘New World Order’, in which he will be the Universal Ruler of the fallen world.
Q: There are Russophobes who say that there continuity between the Tsar’s Russia and Communist Soviet Union. Is that so?
A: There is certainly continuity of Western Russophobia! Read copies of The Times newspaper from 1862 and 2012 for example. You will see 150 years of xenophobia. Yes, it is true that many in the West were Russophobic long before the Soviet Union came into being. There are the narrow-minded among all peoples who are simply racist. Any nationality other than their own must be demonised, whatever their particular political system and however that system may change. We saw that in the recent Iraq War. We can see it now in the tabloid reports on Syria, Iran or North Korea, which try to demonise the peoples of those countries. We do not take those narrow minds seriously.
Now, let us turn to the question of continuity. Following the generation of obscenities after 1917, continuity did re-emerge. This was after Germany had again invaded Russia on the Feast of All the Saints who have shone forth in the Russian Lands in June 1941. Stalin realised that he could only win the war with the blessing of the Church, by recalling the victories of Orthodox Russians in the past, like those of St Alexander Nevsky and Dmitry Donskoy, that any victory would have to be the victory of his ‘brothers and sisters’, the people, not of his ‘comrades’ and his idiotic Communist ideology. Geography does not change, so there is continuity in Russian history.
It is just that the Soviet period was an aberration from that history, a falling away from national destiny, especially in its violent first generation. What is important is the way that the Soviet Union acted that was so perverse, not necessarily what it did, but how it did it. I was struck by the words of the Tsar’s sister, the Grand Duchess Olga, who in her 1960 biography stated: ‘I have always followed Soviet foreign policy with great interest. Hardly anything in it is different from the course adopted by my father and by Nicky’ (by Alexander III and Nicholas II). The difference is that Soviet policy worked through violence and lies, the Tsar’s policies worked through peace and sincerity.
Q: Can you give an example of this?
A: What would have happened if the Revolution had not taken place? We know (and Churchill expressed it very well in his book, ‘The World Crisis 1916-1918’) that Russia was on the verge of victory in 1917. This is why the revolutionaries took action then. They had a very narrow window in which to operate before the great spring offensive of 1917 began.
Had there been no Revolution, Russia would have defeated the Austro-Hungarians, whose multinational and mainly Slav army was on the point of mutiny and collapse anyway. Then Russia would have pushed back the Germans, or rather their Prussian warlords, to Berlin. In other words, the situation would quite possibly have been similar to that in 1945 – with one vital exception. That is that the Armies of the Tsar would have liberated Central and Eastern Europe in 1917-18, not invading it, as in 1944-45. And so they would have liberated Berlin as they liberated Paris in 1814, peacefully and respectfully, without the errors and drunkenness committed by the Red Army.
Q: What could have happened then?
A: The liberation of Berlin, and so of Germany, from Prussian militarism would surely have led to the demilitarisation and regionalisation of Germany, restoring something of pre-1871 Germany, the Germany of culture, music, poetry and tradition. This would have been the end of the Second Reich of Bismarck, which itself was a revival of the First Reich of the militaristic heretic Charlemagne and which led directly in its turn to the Third Reich of Hitler.
If Russia had been victorious, there would have been a humiliation of the German / Prussian government, the Kaiser being sent perhaps into exile to some remote island as was Napoleon. But there would have been no humiliation of the German peoples, the result of the terrible Treaty of Versailles, which led directly to the horrors of Fascism and the Second World War. And that, by the way, has led directly to the Fourth Reich of today’s European Union.
Q: Would France, Britain and the USA not have objected to victorious Russia’s dealings with Berlin?
A: France and Britain, bogged down in their blood-soaked trenches or perhaps by then having reached the French and Belgian borders with Germany, could not have objected to this, because the victory over the Kaiser’s Germany would above all have been a Russian victory. As for the USA, it would never have entered the War, if Russia had not first been knocked out of it – partly by the US financing of revolutionaries, it must be said. And that in itself is why the Allies did their best to eliminate Russia from the War, because they did not want a Russian victory. All they wanted from Russia was cannon fodder to exhaust Germany, in order to prepare it for defeat by the Allies, so that they could finish Germany off and take it over.
Q: Would the Russian Armies have retreated from Berlin and Eastern Europe soon after 1918?
A: Yes, of course. Here is another difference with Stalin, for whom ‘Sovereignty’, the second element in the motto of the Orthodox Empire, had been deformed into Totalitarianism and that meant occupation, oppression and exploitation by terror. After the fall of the German and Austro-Hungarian Empires, there would have been freedom for Eastern Europe with population transfers in border areas and the establishment of new countries without minorities, like a newly-reunited Poland and Czechia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Carpatho-Russia, Romania, Hungary and so on. This would have created a demilitarised zone throughout Eastern and Central Europe.
This would have been an Eastern Europe with rational and protected frontiers, so avoiding the errors of conglomerate States like the future, and now past, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. As regards Yugoslavia, in 1912 Tsar Nicholas had already set up a Balkan Union in order to avoid further Balkan Wars. True, this failed because of the intrigues of the German princeling Ferdinand in Bulgaria and nationalist intrigues in Serbia and Montenegro. We can imagine that after a First World War in which Russia had been victorious, such a Customs Union, established with fair borders, could have become permanent. Involving Greece and Romania, it could at last have established peace in the Balkans, its freedom guaranteed as a Russian protectorate.
Q: What would have been the fate of the Ottoman Empire?
A: The Allies had already agreed in 1916 that Russia would be allowed to free Constantinople and control the Black Sea. This was only what Russia could have attained sixty years before, preventing Turkish massacres in Bulgaria and Asia Minor, had it not been for the Crimean invasion of Russia by France and Great Britain. (We recall how Tsar Nicholas I was buried then with a silver cross depicting Aghia Sophia, the Church of the Wisdom of God, ‘so that in heaven he would not forget to pray for his brothers in the East’). Christian Europe would at last have been freed of Ottoman oppression.
The Armenians and the Greeks of Asia Minor would also have been protected and the Kurds would have had their own State. But more than that, Orthodox Palestine and much of the future Syria and the Jordan would have come under Russian protection. There would have been none of the permanent war that we see in the Middle East today. Perhaps the situations of today’s Iraq and Iran could have been avoided. The implications of this are huge. Can we imagine a Russian-controlled Jerusalem? Even Napoleon recognised that, ‘he who controls Palestine, controls the whole world’. This is known today to Israel and the USA.
Q: What would the implications have been in Asia?
A: Peter I opened a window on Europe. It was the destiny of Nicholas II to open a window on Asia. Despite his generous Church-building in Western Europe and the Americas, he had only a limited interest in the Catholic/Protestant West and its extensions in the Americas and Australia, because it had and has only a limited interest in the Church. In the West, there was and is relatively little potential growth for Orthodox Christianity. Indeed, today, only a small proportion of the world population lives in the Western world, even though it covers a huge territory.
Tsar Nicholas’ aim to serve Christ was therefore more concerned with Asia, especially with Buddhist Asia. He had former Buddhist citizens in the Russian Empire who had converted to Christ, and he knew that Buddhism, like Confucianism, is not a religion, but a philosophy. The Buddhists called him ‘The White Tara’ (King’). So he worked with Tibet, where he was called ‘Chakravartin’ (The King of Peace’), Mongolia, China, Manchuria, Korea and Japan, countries of potential. He was also concerned with Afghanistan, India and Siam (Thailand). The King of Siam, Rama V, visited Russia in 1897 and the Tsar prevented Siam from becoming a French colony. This was an influence that would have spread to Laos, Vietnam and Indonesia. In population terms these countries have nearly half of today’s world.
In Africa, with a seventh of today’s world population, the Tsar had diplomatic relations with Ethiopia and successfully protected it from Italian colonialism, also intervening on behalf of Morocco and also the Boers in South Africa. His detestation of what the British did to the Boers, killing them in concentration camps, is well known. We can think that he must have thought the same about French and Belgian colonialism in Africa. He was also respected by the Muslims, who called him ‘Al-Padishah’, ‘The Great King’. In general, sacral, Eastern civilisations had far more respect for ‘the White Tsar’ than the bourgeois West.
It is significant that later the Soviet Union also opposed the cruelties of Western colonialism in Africa. Here there is also continuity. Today there are Russian Orthodox missions in Thailand, Laos, Indonesia, India and Pakistan, as well as churches in Africa. I think that the contemporary BRICS group, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, is also very representative of what Russia could have achieved 90 years ago, as a member of a group of independent countries. Indeed, the last Maharaja of the Sikh Empire, Duleep (Dalip) Singh (+ 1893), had asked Tsar Alexander III to free India from British exploitation and oppression.
Q: So Asia could have been colonised by Russia?
A: No, definitely not colonised. Imperial Russia was anti-colonial, anti-imperialist. We only have to compare Russian expansion into Siberia, which was basically peaceful, with European expansion into the Americas, which was basically genocidal. The same people –native Americans are basically Siberians – were treated in totally different ways. Of course, there were in Siberia and in Russian America (Alaska) exploitative Russian merchants and drunkard fur trappers who behaved like cowboys towards the local population. This we know from the life of St Herman of Alaska and missionaries in eastern Russia and Siberia, like St Stephen of Perm and St Macarius of the Altai, but this was not the rule and there was no genocide.
Q: All of this is very well, but it is not very relevant to talk about what might have been. It is all hypothetical.
A: Yes, it is hypothetical, but hypotheses can give us a vision for the future. We could view the whole of the last 95 years of world history as a hiatus, a catastrophic aberration of tragic magnitude that has killed hundreds of millions. This is because the world became unbalanced after the fall of the bulwark of Christian Russia, whose fall was implemented by transnational capital in order to create a ‘unipolar world’. And that is simply code for the New World Order of a One World Government, that is, a Universal, anti-Christian Tyranny.
Only if we understand this, can we have a vision for the future. This vision is to suppose that after July 2018, we may still be able to resume where we left off in July 1918, and gather the fragments and oases of Orthodox civilisation worldwide together, before the end. However terrible the present situation is, there is always the hope that is born of repentance. Repentance means going back, and that is what we have been talking about, resuming from where the world left off on that terrible, world-changing night in Ekaterinburg in July 1918.
Q: What would the fruit of such repentance be?
A: A new Orthodox Empire, centred in Russia, with Ekaterinburg, the centre of repentance, as its spiritual capital, and so the chance to rebalance this whole tragic, unbalanced world.
Q: You could be accused of being far too optimistic?
A: Yes, this is very optimistic. But look at what has happened over the last generation, since the celebration of the millennium of the Baptism of Rus in 1988. The situation of the world has been transformed, or rather transfigured, by repentance among enough of the people of the old Soviet Union for the whole world to change. The last 25 years have seen a revolution, the only true revolution, a spiritual revolution, the return to the Church.
Suppose the next generation continues in that revolutionary repentance? Given the historic miracle that we have already seen, which seemed like a ridiculous dream for us who were born during the nuclear fears of the Cold War and can remember the spiritually grim 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s, why should we not envisage at least some of the possibilities outlined above?
In 1914 the world entered a tunnel. During the Cold War we lived in that tunnel and we could see neither light behind us, nor in front of us. Today we are still in the tunnel, but we can now actually see a glimmer of light on the road ahead. Surely this is the light at the end of the tunnel? Let us recall the words of the Gospel: ‘With God all things are possible’.
Yes, humanly, all the above is highly optimistic and there is no guarantee of anything. However, the alternative to the above is not just pessimistic, it is apocalyptic. That time is short is our chief anxiety.
We hurry in a battle against time. And that must be a warning and a call to us all.
This post first appeared on Russia Insider
Referendums are an important part of New Zealand’s democracy, as they allow the public to have a direct voice on changes to the law –
Policy options and law changes are among what New Zealanders can have their say on through referendums.
Source: Parliamentary Service
A referendum is a vote on a question. Referendums usually have a “yes” or “no” answer, but can have more than two possible answers. Referendums can be held with an election, in a stand-alone poll, or by postal vote.
There are two types of referendums in New Zealand—government-initiated, and citizens-initiated.
These are referendums promoted by the Government. They can be used to bring legislation into law, or to gauge how the public feel on a particular issue. These referendums can be non-binding, or binding (which means that the Government has to act on the final result).
Any New Zealand citizen can petition for a referendum, known as a ‘citizens initiated referendum’. For one of these to be held, at least ten percent of eligible voters must sign a petition supporting the proposed referendum question. For context, there were 3.5 million people enrolled to vote at the 2020 election.
These referendums are non-binding, which means the Government doesn’t have to act on the result of it. Under New Zealand law, non-binding referendums can be held on any subject.
There have been a number of citizens-initiated referendums held, although only a few have caused changes to occur. Some referendums have been on:
To see what citizens-initiated referendums are currently in process, click here.
In the 19th and early 20th century, no topic got New Zealanders more fired up than alcohol. Politicians were plagued with arguments from both sides of the debate, while the temperance movement (which aimed to limit the drinking of alcohol) held a lot of political sway.
Four referendums were held between 1894 and 1908 on liquor licenses, but these were not “national” referendums as people could only have their say on licenses in their own areas.
This changed in 1911, with New Zealand’s first nationwide referendum asking voters to choose between national continuance or prohibition of alcohol sales. It wasn’t the last though—by the end of the 20th century, two-thirds of the referendums held had been about alcohol.
Over 2015 and 2016, New Zealand held a two-stage consultative referendum on the New Zealand flag. The first referendum asked voters to rank five alternative flag designs from a shortlist of 40, which had been narrowed from over 10,000 designs submitted by New Zealanders. In the 2016 referendum, voters chose to keep the current flag instead of adopting the preferred alternative option.
This type of referendum is known as “consultative”, as it is used by the Government to gauge the public mood on a particular topic. Others have included:
New Zealand’s most recent referendums were the two held alongside the 2020 general election on the End of Life Choice Act 2019 (which had a successful “yes” vote of 65.1 percent), and the legalisation of recreational cannabis use (which had a “yes” vote of 48.4 percent, and so was not successful).
The End of Life Choice Act 2019 gives people with a terminal illness the option of requesting assisted dying, if two doctors agree the person has less than six months to live. Parliament passed the End of Life Choice Act 2019, but needed a positive referendum result to come into force – which it will do on 6 November 2021 (a year after the date the final votes were announced).
The cannabis referendum asked whether people agreed with the draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, which outlined a proposed law for legalising and controlling cannabis for recreational use. The “yes” vote did not reach the 50 percent threshold and Government members have indicated that they intend to honour the outcome of the referendum. The normal process for changing New Zealand law would have still applied if the referendum had a positive result.
Did Stalin Pluck a Live Chicken as a Lesson to His Followers?
Joseph Stalin (leftwing Jew) was the leader of the communist controlled Soviet Union (Russia) and during his rule millions of Russians was sent to the concentration camps and 20 million mainly white gentiles and many European Jews was killed. The total population killed by communist under Joseph Stalin rule was 40 million.
Many people know the Gestapo. How many know the CHEKA?
Stalin was the worst of the worst. A true monster. It really upsets me when I hear that FDR called him uncle Joe. And it also bothers me that after World War II we gave half of Europe to stalin to rule over. That’s probably why general Patton was killed
Lenin and Stalin ordered executions of the best of the nation: aristocrats, intelligents, artists, business people, scientists,... and the worst trash was left to rule that hell on earth called Soviet Union. The most sosiopathic and psychopathic sadists were chosen as the Cheka and NKVD executioners, creeps like Pjotr Maggo and Nikolai Jesov. They really got some kicks by ordering men and women to strip nude in prison cellar and stand before them, expressing fear and horror in their eyes, and begging mercy. Then, bang bang bang. Maggo by the way, was very short little man, and use to be ignored by women and felt somekind of humiliation from both men and women. So he had his sick pleasure when he had big strong men and women as helples and scared front of him, and then he just put the bullets into them.
Stalin got churches destroyed because he wanted to be the only God for the Soviet Union's people.
The end of Stalin 1953: ”They found Stalin lying on the floor, unconscious and his pyjama bottoms soaked in urine. They rang Lavrentii Beria, Stalin’s Chief of Police, who arrived and bellowed at the staff, “Can’t you see Comrade Stalin is deeply asleep. Get out of here and don’t wake him up.”
Coveners League has many articles, here is a small sample, please check them out.
Teach White Europeans About Their Ice Age Heritage
White European Racial Pride. What Race Are You ?
White History, Music, Wars, Dances and Film Archives
Whites Fight Back Against Racism & Bigotry
European Birth Rate Statistics. Update 2
The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan - To Genocide Indigenous Europeans in Europe
Europe & Middle Eastern Wildlife. Update 2
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
Media Ownership: The Illusion of Choice
White Gentile Organizations & Jewish Community Based Organizations
Citizens Initizens Referendums ( CIR ) in Switzerland
Communist agent that helped take down South Africa by Jewish billionaires
Communist agent that helped take down South Africa in the 80s and 90s brags that he was bankrolled by Jewish billionaires.
Solidarity membership is mainly, but not exclusively, White Afrikaners.
The Coveners League has written about community-based organizations many times; this is one reason why the Jewish community is so successful. Community-based organizations have not been developed to represent Whites in western countries, except for South Africa.
South Africa has two community-based organizations; one is Orania, Orania White Afrikaner Community which is a farming community and village, and the the second one is the solidarity union organization.
If you need legal advice or perhaps represent you in the court.
If you want to find books on Afrikaans history or send your children to a technical college, or wanting to get involved in cultural or youth solidarity movements, contact this organization.
Every White in South Africa should join because Solidarity is fighting for white rights and your can become a member of any of the listed groups. If you care about helping people and want to donate, contact them.
We would like to see this organization develop branches into other countries. The best way to do this is to join, learn and form groups.
 |
|
| Full name | Solidarity |
|---|---|
| Native name | Solidariteit/Solidarity |
| Founded | 22 June 1902 |
| Members | 130,000 (2008)[1] |
| Affiliation | ITUC, CONSAWU |
| Key people | Flip Buys (general secretary) Dirk Hermann (deputy general secretary: Development) Steve Scott (president) |
| Office location | Pretoria, South Africa |
| Country | South Africa |
| Website | http://solidariteit.co.za/ |
Solidarity (Afrikaans: Solidariteit) is a South African trade union that negotiates on behalf of its members and attempts to protect workers' rights. Although the union is often involved in issues of political import, it does not align or formally affiliate itself with any political party. Solidarity is a trade union within the Christian tradition of unionism. This differentiates it from the majority of other South African trade unions that have socialist ideologies. Solidarity has a broader focus than workers' rights and includes defending civil rights for its members.
The union has positioned itself as a vehicle for minorities in South Africa to have their voices heard. Its membership is mainly, but not exclusively, Afrikaners.
AfriForum, an independent initiative of Solidarity.
Solidarity started the Growthfund in 2008 with the objective of collecting R100 million for the empowerment of the Afrikaans community.
Akademia is a private tertiary institution, providing distance learning in Afrikaans.
Maroela Media is a site publishing Afrikaans news articles. It focuses on topics of concern to the Solidarity movement's membership.
In 2006 Solidarity started an Afrikaans technical college in Centurion. This college offers young people training in technical areas like vehicle mechanics, electronics, fitting and turning, and others. The college has since moved to larger premises in Hermanstad in Pretoria West and has been able to enroll more students than before.
The Federasie van Afrikaanse Kultuurvereniginge ("Federation of Afrikaans Cultural Associations") is a non-profit, non-governmental Afrikaans cultural organisation.
SBM is the investment arm of the trade union and manages businesses that provide additional services to members.
Kraal publishers ("Kraal Uitgewers") focuses on publishing books on South African history.
NORTHERN CAPE
Adele Rossouw
Administrative Officer: Jaatjé Sherman
Tel: 053 723 1604
Fax: 053 723 1407
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Shop 1B, Prosperitas Building, Rietbok Street, Kathu
NORTH WEST
Coenie Rheeder, Danny Schutte
Administrative Officer: Leanne Meyer
Tel: 018 468 8533/9 of 018 468 8547
Fax: 018 468 8563
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Buffelspark, Office 2, 48 Buffelsdoorn Avenue, Flamwood, Klerksdorp
Posal Address: P.O. Box 14550, Flamwood, 2572
Johan Nell (litigant), Eric Schoeman, Lucindi van Zyl ( junior litigant) en Tommy Wedderspoon
Administrative Officer: Carisma Breet en Jumarie Palm
Tel: 014 592 4336
Fax: 014 592 4371
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Cnr President Mbeki and Heystek Streets, Total Garage, Office 4, Rustenburg
GAUTENG
Renate Barnard, Helgard Cronje, Jahni de Villiers, Sta-Sia Engelbrecht, Sulize Esterhuizen, Rene Harmse, Inge Labuschagne, Linda Senekal, Lizette Snyman, Wynand Strydom en Willie Venter
Administrative Officer: Christa Louw, Anke Cloete
Tel: 012 644 4442/8
Fax: 012 349 8880
E-mail: //solidariteit.co.za/en/head-office/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Cnr DF Malan and Eendracht Streets, Kloofsig
Gibbs du Toit (litigant), Amanda Hattingh, Thinus Jacobs, Derek Mans, Francois van Heerden, Dana Viljoen (litigant), Fanie Vosloo en Hennie Vosloo
Administrative Officer: Marlindie Booyens, Natasha van Heerden en Veruchka Whithead
Tel: 011 913 0783 / 1101 / 1105
Fax: 011 913 3850
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: 232 Rondebult Road, Libradene, Boksburg
Coenie Rheeder
Administrative Officer: Petro Watson
Tel: 018 788 4861/018 786 2785
Fax: 018 788 5102/011 388 9854
E-mail: //solidariteit.co.za/en/head-office/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: 74 Van Zyl Smit Street, Oberholzer, Carletonville
Francois Calldo, Gerhard Cloete, Lee Coetzee, Nadia Coetzee, JJ Fernandes, Jaco van den Berg en Johan Venter
Administrative Officer: Saretha Jacobs En Chanell van Gent
Tel: 016 931 3160
Fax: 016 981 6718
E-mail: //solidariteit.co.za/en/head-office/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: 130 Rossini Boulevard, Vanderbijlpark
EASTERN CAPE
Ivan Smith
Administrative Officer: Yris du Plessis
Tel: 041 364 2925
Fax: 041 364 2927
E-mail: //solidariteit.co.za/en/head-office/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: 52 Sixth Avenue, Newton Park, Port Elizabeth
Posal Address: P.O. Box 63788, Greenacres, Port Elizabeth, 6057
FREE STATE
Pieter Burger
Administrative Officer: Ingrid Papenfus
Tel: 051 430 6152/3
Fax: 051 430 6163
E-mail: //solidariteit.co.za/en/head-office/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: 58C Kellner Street, Westdene, Bloemfontein
Hennie Kommer
Administrative Officer: Sue Nel
Tel: 057 352 6839
Fax: 057 357 2072
E-mail: //solidariteit.co.za/en/head-office/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Shop 5, The Strip, Metro Village, 312 Staats Road, Welkom
LIMPOPO
Deon Viviers
Administrative Officer: Antonett Olckers
Tel: (014) 763 1174
Fax: (014) 763 1264
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Shop 4C, Marula Mile Mall, 35 Louis Botha Road, Ellisras
WESTERN CAPE
Raymond Holland-Chapman, Deon de Jager (junior litigant), Anton Gerretsen, Bennie Harmse en Ettienne Pio (litigant)
Administrative Officer: Nicole Harmse en Yvette Erasmus
Tel: 021 946 4440
Fax: 021 949 4259
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Second floor, Imperial Terraces, Tyger Waterfront, Tyger Vallei.
KWAZULU-NATAL
Administrative Officer: Elize Bronkhorst
Tel: 034 312 9711/9917
Fax: 034 312 5170
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: 79 Harding Street, Sanlam Park, Block B, Newcastle
John Smith
Administrative Officer: Karin van der Watt
Tel: 035 753 1935 / 035 753 1936
Fax: 035 753 1937
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: 12 Anglers Rod Street, Meerensee, Richards Bay
MPUMALANGA
Clifford Smith
Administrative Officer: Bianka Broodryk
Tel: 013 235 3698 of 013 235 4985
Fax: 013 235 1814
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Versekeringsforum Building, Cnr Viljoen and Maasdorp Streets, Lydenburg
Andy O'Toole
Administrative Officer: Sandra Scheepers
Tel: 017 634 5296
Fax: 017 634 5297
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: First floor, Cnr Joe Slovo and Moor Streets, Extension 22, Secunda
Cornelius van Leeuwen, Jan du Plessis
Administrative Officer: Irma Oberholzer, Sonja Bekker
Tel: 013 656 3871
Fax: 013 656 6846
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Address: Bureau de Paul 2B, Corridor Crescent, Route N4 Business Park, Ben Fleur X11
Solidarity membership: We don’t let you struggle in the #WORKplace on your own! Join now. https://solidariteit.co.za/1-minuut-a...
AfriForum is a South African Civil Rights Organization linked to the Solidarity Trade Union
AfriForum announces comprehensive international campaign against civil rights violations.
Membership 235,000.
AfriforumFacebook | Twitter | YouTube | Donate
Europeans worldwide are losing their rights because they have never built a legal, civil rights organization to fight for their rights in the courts. The following article on AfriForum, a civil rights NGO (Non-Governmental Organization), outlines a structure that we would like to be replicated in all Western countries.
We believe if such an organization had been built in Western countries in the 1950s to represent Europeans and other races took the appropriate action against Governments and against the race relations/equality acts and the genocide of different races was fought against in the courts, we may have reversed the situation that we find ourselves in today for example, instead of the Establishment allowing different races and cultures to be destroyed, it could have been stopped. It is sad to say that conservatism, which is phony nationalism promoted by so-called pro-whites, has really hindered our development because they did not build an Anti-Defamation Council and have not been able to change from their narrow ideas.
If you want such a group to be successful, you must fight for all racial groups. If you fight internationally for indigenous rights, including your own, you will have a better chance at being successful with this organizational setup. When setting up an organization please refer to our Affirmative Action article and ensure you set up a security council with founding members to prevent being penetrated and being taken over by undesirables.
Solidarity Organization in South Africa.
AfriForum is a South African Civil Rights Organization linked to the Solidarity Trade Union which was established in 2006, with a membership of approximately 170,000. Its objective is to encourage the participation of minority groups such as Afrikaners in public debate and civil action. It particularly promotes the protection of Afrikaner culture, has opposed the renaming of streets, and affirmative action within South Africa which it considers a form of discrimination. It aims to mobilize civil society specifically within minority communities in order to take part in the democratic debate.
Its motto is: 'Laat jou stem hoor' English translation: 'Have your say.' The Solidarity Trade Union (the only Christian Trade Union in South Africa), Legal Fund accepts donations. The website reports on their recent activities.
AfriForum is campaigning on many critical issues for South Africans. Which include:
• Campaigning against the murder of white farmers to be declared as a priority crime.
• Campaigning against corruption. Petitioning against the dangerous practice of Fracking (hydraulic fracturing), in KZN (the province of KwaZulu-Natal or Natal) which refers to the process through which rocks are fractured by a liquid under very high pressure to release natural gas from shale rock deep below the earth.
• Monitoring the drinking and sewage water quality within towns where its branches are active. Due to poor management and enforcement by the water regulator, AfriForum in some cases is intervening to ensure communities have safe and sufficient drinking water.
• Organizing communities at a grassroots level to address among other things, poor service delivery, and unsafe neighborhoods.
• Through AfriForum Youth, they have engaged in the debate about Afrikaans as a language of instruction at the University of the Free State (UFS) where the council voted in December 2015 for English to be the primary medium of instruction.
AfriForum's CEO Kallie Kriel outlined AFriforums goals in an interview:
"We would like to achieve balance in South Africa. True democracy needs alternative voices in order to succeed. While we aren’t a political party, we give alternative ideas and suggestions, where applicable, to the government stance."
"We are open to all races and we stand as an important check and balance in the interests of society as a whole, an example being our action against the government for failing to adhere to its constitutional obligations in dealing with crime."
"In addition, we take on minority issues — their voices need to be heard; one good example being, the fight to retain Afrikaans as a medium of instruction at schools and university levels."
The Youth division wishes to achieve cultural freedom for Afrikaners based on a framework of Christian democratic ideals. Currently, young AFrikaaners do not feel they can express their culture, language or religion without prejudice. The Youth division of Afriforum successfully won a civil court case against Julius Malema who repeatedly signs the words, "Kill the Boer," at many ANC Youth League gatherings. Judge Collin Lamont, ruled in favor of the Afriforum and passed a guilty sentence within the High Court in Johannesburg in September 2011. He stated that: "it undermined the dignity of Afrikaners, and was discriminatory and harmful."
This is not the only charge of hate speech that AfriForum has taken to court. They have taken other individuals including Ronald Lamola of the ANC Youth League who stated their political party would not guarantee the safety of Afrikaans who refused to give up their lands and mineral rights voluntarily. They also put in a complaint against Jason Mfusi, the leader of SASCO who stated on Social Networking sites: “My grandfather says a good farmer is a dead farmer.”
In all these cases, the Afriforum were successful with the outcomes in their favor.
The Afriforum are committed to promoting multilingualism within the country. Their latest campaign is with the University of Pretoria who is currently considering switching all their lectures to English only. The Youth division had been attempting to resolve this through discussion with no avail so a campaign has now begun to ensure all students are protected and given equal opportunities for learning.
Kriel believes the EFF has an agenda behind this and is part of a larger campaign:
"According to AfriForum, the EFF’s fight against Afrikaans is just a next step in their campaign to disrupt the campus with a view to mobilisation and the creation of publicity for the forthcoming municipal elections."
This is not the first time there have been violent hate protests against Afrikaners who were upset about the lack of diversity in their universities. The EFF violently assaulted white students with whips at the Elsenburg Agricultural College during an illegal and aggressive protest.
The EFF have shown increasing levels of violence against and Afrikaners (Boers) especially since Malema took over as President. Afriforum is continually trying to step up and provide a rational counter argument to their violence through numerous court cases, negotiations and media campaigns. Recently the EFF defaced many Afrikaner street signs in Pretoria by spray painting the letters 'EFF' over the name. Ian Cameron, the AfriForum Youth's spokesperson made the following statement:
“It is clear that the EFF remains a radical ‘blacks only’ political party. Their actions prove to citizens that there is no place for Afrikaner heritage in this country,”
“Our actions aim to broaden mutual acknowledgement and respect for one another’s culture and heritage, not to detract from it. To paint over someone else’s culture is not the way to respect their heritage.”
Genocide of Afrikaner FarmersThis organization has regularly criticized the government for its blatant disregard of the serious problem of farm murders. AfriForum activists are petitioning for farm murders to be declared a priority crime. They have raised widespread local awareness and increased international awareness of the problem by means of several campaigns including ‘Stop the Murders’ campaign.
In 2011, 25% of South Africa was owned and managed by the State. The majority of white-owned land is handled by commercial farmers who are the primary South African food producers. Alarmingly their numbers are dwindling rapidly with latest estimates showing approximately 30,000 farmers left. Fifteen years ago there were 60,000 white/Afrikaner farmers, yet the African Government does not feel there are any issues.
In 2010 a legal team for AfriForum representing farmers in Zimbabwe won a court bid to sue Zimbabwe's government over its “cruel” and “vengeful” expropriation of South African-owned farms. In 2008 the regional court SADC tribunal ruled that Zimbabwe's land reform was illegal and racist, and that those who had suffered discrimination by having their farms expropriated had the right to compensation.
Afriforum wins first round in Zimbabwe case
AfriForum’s started a Community Safety Department to promote the safety of citizens within communities. Its main emphasis is to establish safety structures including neighborhood watches, farm watches, community forums and radio networks. In 2011 AfriForum commissioned Professor Rudolph Zinn of UNISA to conduct research into successful community safety structures in South Africa. The research has led to the compilation of a community safety handbook that has been implemented in all AfriForum branches countrywide. The department also focuses on the role of government and in particular that of law enforcement agencies and acts as a pressure group so that citizens get the best safety and security possible.
AfriForum security video of farm attack
What is White Genocide and who is behind it? #AltRight
THE SOUTH-AFRICAN GENOCIDE (Part 1)
Solidarity Legal Fund - States Should Interfere Less and Spend Less
South African Family Relief Project
https://www.generation-identity.org.uk/ Support the movement here: https://www.generation-identity.org.u.
.. https://www.makersupport.com/GenIdUKI...
Join or Support #120db: http://www.120db.info/en/
AfriForum needs to build Community Based Organization
Community Based Organization (CBO) Engagements
Community Organization and Building - 3-30-16 Lecture
White South Africans need to build regional Congress and Unite with European Congresses in other countries.
Lauren Southern South Africa, The Truth # farmlands
South Africa The Truth #farmlands
Imperial Russia, sided with the Afrikaners, in their war against UK aggression 1899-1902. Many Russian military volunteered to fight on the side of the Boers. I'opine, that Afrikaners people, has a common past history with Russia, should help them to make their choice where to move, to avoid their possible genocide, funded by Western liberals?
Russia Welcomes Afrikaners: 15000 Boers Plans To Move To Russia From South Africa
Everybody please send the following video links to President Trump.
New Law And Order Episode Depicts Infowars Reporter Being Raped
Lauren Southern on South Africa: FARMLANDS (Are Whites History?)
INFOWARS HACKED: Taken Down After CNN Calls For Alex Jones To Be Silenced
Write letter to President Trump ask him to allow all White South Africans into the United States
TTY/TTD
Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitor’s Office: 202-456-2121
Here are a few simple things you can do to make sure your message gets to the White House as quickly as possible.
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
George Galloway on Who funded the ANC
says
Anti-semite: Anyone who discovers the Truth about the jews and shares it with others.
Christians for Truth
During a 2003 speech at Oxford Union, former Labour MP and out-spoken critic of Israel, George Galloway, was interrupted by Jewish protesters who waved the Israeli and accused him of “racism” against Jews — which prompted him to defend himself by revealing his activism in South Africa with the Jews who led the anti-Apartheid movement there:
I am one of the few people on the Left in Britain who traveled the length and breadth of Apartheid South Africa — as an underground agent of the African National Congress led by Nelson Mandela — then in Pollsmoor Prison in Cape Town.
The subject of Apartheid is particularly important to me. The question of racism is particularly important to me. And in parenthesis let me tell you this — that throughout the entirely of my time underground in South Africa under Apartheid, every house I slept in, every dinner I ate, every car I drove in was provided by Jewish activists of the African National Congress. So Jews don’t have to be on the side of Apartheid. They don’t have to be on the side of racism.
Jewish heroes amongst my blood brotherhood, like Denis Goldberg, who served 27 years on Robben Island, in Pollsmoor Prison, but was never able to touch Mandela and his comrades because they were on one side of the Apartheid prison wall, and he and a few other Jewish heroes of the African National Congress were on the other. Denis Goldberg, Albie Sachs, Joe Slovo, Ruth First. Perhaps you’ve heard of these people — if you haven’t, look them up.
Jews don’t have to be on the side of Apartheid. They can stand up against it. And I say this to those who say they are friends of the state whose flag that was just waved in my face, turn away from the racist Apartheid ideology of Zionism. Turn back to where Jews were before the emergence and hegemony of Zionism.
The greatest people on the earth were Jews. The leaders of the socialist, communist, trade union — Liberal — Enlightenment — throughout the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries were great Jews. Marx himself was a Jew. None of them believed as Jews they should go and take somebody’s else’s country and drive millions of them around the world as refugees. All of them would have turned their back against such an ideology.
But because of my experience in South Africa….because of the decades that I worked against Apartheid in South Africa, do you imagine that I would turn up at a university and debate Apartheid with a supporter from South Africa of the Apartheid system? I’d rather punch them in the face than debate with them. Why? Because Apartheid is a racist poison. It is the worst kind of fascism. And I would never debate, with any supporter of South African Apartheid. Why should I debate any supporter of Israeli Apartheid?
George Galloway is a textbook example of a “useful idiot” — a “gentile” who devotes his life to Jewish revolutionary causes only to find at the end of it that he’s no longer useful — and has actually become part of the problem.
Socialism and communism were the revolutionary mechanisms that Jews used to undermine, subvert and destroy White Christian nations — and deliver those nations into the hands of Jewish oligarchs who have become the new de facto aristocracy.
That Jewish aristocracy — contrary to what the dupe George Galloway naively believes — is inherently racist, and has always been racist.
Galloway sincerely believes that Karl Marx is “one of the greatest people on earth” — even though his ideology has led to the wholesale murder of over 100 million people in the last 100 years.
After all, another “great Jew” — Vladimir Lenin — once rationalized those murders in the cause of communism as — you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet — apparently, 100 million eggs and counting.
And no doubt George Galloway considers the mass murderer Leon Trotsky another “great” Jew — who would see Galloway not as a “brother in arms” but for what he really is — just another of the “white negroes” who will be the de facto slaves of the Jewish bankers who finance this ongoing revolution:
We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one. We mean the word ‘red’ literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution’s funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.” (From the ‘Memoirs of Aron Simanovich’, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst.)
And that describes the world today — under the guise of a fake pandemic — White nations have indeed been “reduced to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence” — and it’s going to get a lot worse.
These Jewish oligarchs fully intend to treat White Christians they way they treated the vanquished Germans and Japanese after World War II.
Clearly, Galloway naively believes that communism and Zionism are two mutually exclusive ideologies — when, in fact, they are inextricable from each other — Galloway served the ultimate Zionist agenda by helping to destroy Apartheid in South Africa.
The anti-Apartheid Jews of South Africa like the late Denis Goldberg weren’t motivated by their love for Blacks but rather their hatred for White Christian nations — and White South Africa had to be destroyed less it be an example to other healthy White nations.
For proof of this we need to look no further than Kim Heller, a current Jewish leader of the South Africa ANC — she makes no attempt to hide her hatred of her “fellow” White people.
And now that Galloway has outlived his usefulness, he may very quickly find himself investigated by the police for “hate speech” — like fellow Zionist critic, Bristol University professor David Miller.
In fact, Oxford University — where Galloway gave this rousing anti-Zionist speech in 2003 — has adopted the new IHRA definition of “antisemitism” — which means Galloway would now be censored and possibly investigated for “inciting racial hatred” against Jews for this speech.
The Jewish oligarchs that own and run Facebook announced that they will be censoring the use of terms like “Zionism” — which they now consider a “dog whistle” for antisemitism.
And YouTube — also owned and controlled by the same pro-Zionist supremacists — are following suit and censoring “anti-Zionist” content — which will eventually include this Galloway speech from 2003.
All Jewish sensationalism aside, Hendrik Verwoerd — the former leader of South Africa who was murdered at the behest of the Jewish bankers — explains the simplicity of Apartheid — and why it was in everyone’s best interests — except for the Jews:
Apartheid
Hendrik Verwoerd Defines Apartheid
Good try but Interpol and Europol operate under international law and each nation creates their own ... interpol allows for the sharing of intelligence on any subject or individual/s jeopardizing National Security !
